Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Šumperk

IČO 00303461

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

2.
ranking
82%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
ZAJIŠTĚNÍ SBĚRU, ODVOZU A ODSTRANĚNÍ (VYUŽITÍ) SMĚSNÉHO, BIOLOGICKY ROZLOŽITELNÉHO A OBJEMNÉHO KOMUNÁLNÍHO ODPADU, STAVEBNÍHO ODPADU, PNEUMATIK A NEBEZPEČNÝCH SLOŽEK KOMUNÁLNÍHO ODPADU
Refuse and waste related services
1
Ø2 in industry
Stavební úpravy budovy 28. října 1 pro městskou knihovnu
Construction work for buildings relating to leisure, sports, culture, lodging and restaurants
10
Ø4 in industry
Domov se zvláštním režimem pro osoby bez přístřeší
Accommodation and restaurant buildings
8
Ø4 in industry
Nemocnice Šumperk - pavilon B - snižování energetické náročnosti budovy
Thermal insulation work
3
Ø8 in industry
Veselá školka - navýšení kapacity MŠ v Šumperku
Construction work for kindergarten buildings
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SITA CZ a.s.
1 65,927,620
VW WACHAL a.s.
1 41,879,789
EKOZIS spol. s r.o.
5 36,730,534
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
3 19,279,688
NOSTA, s.r.o.
1 18,866,786
Other suppliers 22 115,202,395

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

65%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 649,898,066
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 889,005,871
Total 1,538,903,938

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 9% (3 from 33)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 33)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 33)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 33)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 33)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 33)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

90%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 94% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.13 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 31 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders