Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Ostrava

IČO 00845451

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

8.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

77%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce a modernizace DK Poklad
Restoration work
13
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce ul. Nádražní
Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines, for highways, roads, airfields and railways; flatwork
9
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce ÚČOV - Dosazovací nádrže č. 1 - 10
Sewerage work
13
Ø7 in industry
Nová radnice - rekonstrukce fasády a oken
Installation of doors and windows and related components
8
Ø6 in industry
Areál ZOO - energie
Electrical wiring and fitting work
10
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STAMONT - POZEMNÍ STAVITELSTVÍ s.r.o.
1 148,789,988
STRABAG a.s., odštěpný závod Ostrava
2 138,414,651
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
4 114,197,118
STASPO, spol. s r.o.
10 101,951,854
HOCHTIEF CZ a.s.
3 99,685,245
Other suppliers 127 1,380,937,735

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

74%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 48% (31 from 65)
Nonprice competition 3% (2 from 66)
Division into lots 14% (9 from 66)
E-auction 14% (9 from 66)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 66)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

42%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 3,877,476,038
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 17,912,698,805
Total 21,790,174,843

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

92%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
MFB III, IV - VTP Ostrava - Dodatek č. 6
Technical exclusivity
- 12,427,066
Přestupní uzel Hulváky, I. etapa - Dodatek č. 1
Technical exclusivity
- 9,502,229
MFB III, IV - VTP Ostrava - Dodatek č. 5
Technical exclusivity
- 7,896,751
Kanalizace Petřkovice II. a III. etapa - dodatek č. 2
Technical exclusivity
- 3,717,244
Rekonstrukce ul. Nádražní - dodatek č. 2
Technical exclusivity
- 2,134,917

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 9%
Average requirements modifications count 0.71

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 149)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 149)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 149)
Missing call for tenders 3% (5 from 149)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 149)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 149)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

58%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 76% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.71 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 129 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders