Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Ostrava

IČO 00845451

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

9.
ranking
76%
Zindex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Multifunkční budova III, IV - VTP Ostrava
Výstavba administrativních budov
7
Ø4 in industry
Veřejná zakázka na poskytování pojistných služeb
Pojištění
3
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce ul. Nádražní
Stavební práce pro potrubní, telekomunikační a elektrické vedení, pro dálnice, silnice, přistávací plochy a železnice; zarovnávání ploch
9
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce kanalizace a vodovodu Svinov
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
14
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce kanalizace Jeremenko - III. ETAPA
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
11
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

94%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Skanska a.s.
9 409,530,935
Strabag a.s.
15 297,553,915
Česká pojišťovna a.s.
1 192,649,510
Ohl Žs, a.s.
3 178,811,137
Europe Easy Energy a.s.
6 141,072,334
Other suppliers 511 2,791,953,370

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

77%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (59 from 0)
Nonprice competition 15% (28 from 186)
Division into lots 28% (53 from 186)
E-auction and DPS 12% (23 from 186)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 186)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 4,117,512,816
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 10,800,254,408
Total 14,917,767,224

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

69%
average 77%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Estetizace přednádražního prostoru v Ostravě - Přívoze
Not disclosed
- 60,880,718
Estetizace přednádražního prostoru v Ostravě - Přívoze
Not disclosed
- 58,953,826
Revitalizace přednádražního prostoru Svinov - Dodatek č. 6
Not disclosed
- 26,207,086
„Zimní údržba komunikací na území SMO-MOb Poruba na zimní období 2013-2014“
Not disclosed
- 17,914,450
Zimní údržba komunikací na území SMO-MOb Poruba na zimní období 2014-2015
Not disclosed
- 17,194,450

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

72%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 2%
Cancelled contracts 18%
Average requirements modifications count 0.36

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 4% (22 from 549)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 549)
Missing buyer ID 0% (1 from 549)
Missing call for tenders 12% (66 from 549)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 549)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 549)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 46%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 74% (zakázek z ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.46 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 0 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 0 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 0 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 549)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 1% (4 from 549)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 5% (30 from 549)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 549)
Supplier bankruptcy 1% (3 from 549)
Supplier donating to political party 10% (55 from 549)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 21% (113 from 549)