Government - small authorities • 2022 • past ranking

Národní galerie v Praze

IČO 00023281

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

44%
average 40%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Technická správa objektů Národní galerie v Praze
Real estate services
6
Ø1 in industry
Poskytování bezpečnostních služeb v objektech Národní galerie v Praze
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
5
Ø2 in industry
Zajištění úklidových služeb v objektech užívaných Národní galerií v Praze
Cleaning services
4
Ø4 in industry
NG, Praha Jinonice - novostavba depozitární budovy, 1. a 2. etapa
Architectural and related services
3
Ø3 in industry
NG, Praha Jinonice - novostavba depozitární budovy, 1. a 2. etapa, Id. č. 134V131000041
Architectural and related services
0
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

99%
average 88%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KART, spol. s r.o.
1 50,326,784
G4S Secure Solutions (CZ), a.s.
1 42,274,328
TSB spol. s r.o.
1 33,481,314
JIKA - CZ s.r.o.
1 19,586,999
KUNSTTRANS PRAHA, spol. s r.o.
5 12,676,562
Other suppliers 54 114,642,664

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

30%
average 31%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 16)
Nonprice competition 13% (4 from 30)
Division into lots 10% (3 from 30)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 30)
Innovative procedure 3% (1 from 30)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

57%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 340,777,682
Small scale tenders 137,446,583
Unregulated purchases 977,464,753
Total 1,455,689,017

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

70%
average 85%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Alberto Giacometti, převzetí výstavy
Authorship rights
- 12,104,139
Nákup jedinečného uměleckého díla
Art exclusivity
- 3,305,785
Oprava střech Anežského kláštera - 2. a 3. etapa: Oprava střešní krytiny kostela sv. Františka a přilehlé věže, a hospodářské části areálu
Contract modification
9,988,422 490,163 (+5%)
Transporty uměleckých děl a předmětů výstavy Alberto Giacometti
Contract modification
1,852,080 435,051 (+24%)
Transporty uměleckých děl a předmětů pro výstavu s pracovním názvem "Rembrandt - Drama of Mind in 5 Acts”
Contract modification
3,091,296 266,540 (+9%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

72%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 0.44
Average decision length 81.75 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 95%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 33)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 33)
Missing buyer ID 3% (1 from 33)
Missing call for tenders 15% (5 from 33)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 33)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 3% (1 from 33)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

45%
average 70%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 81% (zakázek z 32 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.88 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 32 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 10 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 6 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 8 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 16 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

75%
average 75%
There is insufficient data for score calculation. The indicator is not included in the evaluation and it is going to be taken into account next year.