Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases. Enough firms are competing for contracts.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce Liebiegova paláce pro potřeby polyfunkčního komunitního centra - Centrum aktivního života - stavba
Construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
|
Sociální bydlení města Liberce Na Žižkově - stavební práce
Construction work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Navýšení kapacit MŠ Malínek, Liberec - stavba
Construction work |
9
Ø4 in industry |
|
Vodojem Horská a zásobní řady - stavební práce
Construction work |
12
Ø4 in industry |
|
Navýšení kapacit MŠ Pastelka - stavba
Construction work for kindergarten buildings |
11
Ø5 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
CL-EVANS s.r.o. |
1 | 168,185,876 |
|
První podještědská stavební spol. s r.o. |
2 | 151,943,000 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
2 | 60,327,573 |
|
STAVEBNÍ SPOLEČNOST GUTTENBERG s.r.o. |
1 | 57,790,662 |
|
ŠEBESTA VHS, v.o.s. |
1 | 52,862,418 |
| Other suppliers | 207 | 1,078,987,438 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
CL-EVANS s.r.o. |
1 | 168,185,876 |
|
První podještědská stavební spol. s r.o. |
2 | 151,943,000 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
2 | 60,327,573 |
|
STAVEBNÍ SPOLEČNOST GUTTENBERG s.r.o. |
1 | 57,790,662 |
|
ŠEBESTA VHS, v.o.s. |
1 | 52,862,418 |
|
Pozemní stavitelství s.r.o. |
7 | 44,219,381 |
|
WORLD INVEST v.o.s. |
1 | 42,558,802 |
|
BREX, spol. s r.o. |
3 | 34,003,372 |
|
EUROVIA CS, a.s. |
7 | 30,304,963 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
4 | 28,648,918 |
|
Bagro - Trans s.r.o. |
4 | 22,333,967 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
3 | 21,509,197 |
|
INSTAV stavební práce s.r.o. |
2 | 20,394,471 |
|
čekro CZ s.r.o. |
4 | 19,743,081 |
|
WARMNIS spol. s r.o. |
1 | 19,377,400 |
|
NISA CREDIT s.r.o. |
4 | 16,373,348 |
|
AV MEDIA, a.s. |
2 | 14,700,762 |
|
Metrostav a.s. |
1 | 12,969,445 |
|
IBR Consulting, s.r.o. |
1 | 12,960,000 |
|
LAMA energy a.s. |
2 | 12,591,538 |
|
MSV Liberec, s.r.o. |
2 | 12,112,320 |
|
1. jizerskohorská stavební společnost, s.r.o. |
1 | 11,881,082 |
|
Hoyer Praha s.r.o. |
1 | 8,481,114 |
|
STYLSTAV Liberec s.r.o. |
9 | 8,138,125 |
|
Metrostav Infrastructure a.s. |
1 | 7,979,108 |
|
TELMO a.s. |
2 | 7,874,345 |
|
PERENA Liberec, s.r.o. |
1 | 6,892,493 |
|
ATELIER 11 HRADEC KRÁLOVÉ s.r.o. |
1 | 6,770,111 |
|
KOVOLINE, s.r.o. |
2 | 6,292,933 |
|
TEP Jablonec, spol. s r.o. |
6 | 6,039,630 |
|
SYBAN, s.r.o. |
1 | 5,999,888 |
|
WISS CZECH, s.r.o. |
1 | 5,699,500 |
|
FLORA SERVIS s.r.o. |
2 | 5,394,210 |
|
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 5,036,924 |
|
DigiTry Art Technologies s.r.o. |
1 | 4,850,000 |
|
BARNATHERM s.r.o. |
3 | 4,831,080 |
|
SWARCO TRAFFIC CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 4,798,974 |
|
PETRAS Petr Šrut |
1 | 4,496,371 |
|
TECHNICO Opava s.r.o. |
1 | 4,360,000 |
|
NDCON s.r.o. |
2 | 4,071,600 |
|
STAVO - UNION, stavební společnost s r.o. |
1 | 4,048,366 |
|
ASTRA zahrady s.r.o. |
6 | 4,040,060 |
|
MEVA-TEC s.r.o. |
1 | 3,939,750 |
|
S.O.S. - DEKORACE, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,939,473 |
|
L&P stavební, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,871,968 |
|
Sdružení TULIPAN, z.s. |
1 | 3,546,384 |
|
M - SILNICE a.s. |
1 | 3,497,637 |
|
DKK Stav s.r.o. |
1 | 3,273,239 |
|
AGORA - architektonický a stavební atelier, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 3,150,000 |
|
NAODPAD s.r.o. |
1 | 2,893,000 |
|
ANEGG, S.R.O. |
2 | 2,889,684 |
|
ZIKUDA - vodohospodářské stavby spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,869,114 |
|
Miroslav Čonka |
1 | 2,555,550 |
|
SKJ s.r.o. |
2 | 2,486,619 |
|
FS Vison, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,397,000 |
|
RENOVA, s.r.o. |
2 | 2,360,026 |
|
GARTENSTA PLUS s.r.o. |
1 | 2,336,365 |
|
TEWIKO systems, s.r.o. |
4 | 2,105,183 |
|
SANTAL spol. s r. o. |
1 | 2,058,401 |
|
AUTO GREMOS, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 2,012,397 |
|
STROMOTOM, s.r.o. |
6 | 2,010,408 |
|
MAFRA, a.s. |
1 | 1,724,881 |
|
SIZ s.r.o. |
1 | 1,710,269 |
|
VODIZOL, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,636,975 |
|
Aron house, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,628,456 |
|
AZ Demolice s.r.o. |
1 | 1,627,074 |
|
Lesprojekt Stará Boleslav s.r.o. |
1 | 1,614,732 |
|
FORVIA CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 1,606,800 |
|
Jan Šeliga |
1 | 1,588,080 |
|
TeS, spol. s r.o. Chotěboř |
1 | 1,578,498 |
|
BENJAMÍN s.r.o. |
2 | 1,571,797 |
|
ATLAS AUDIT s.r.o. |
1 | 1,492,000 |
|
THT Polička, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,487,000 |
|
Digitronic CZ s.r.o. |
2 | 1,475,000 |
|
Karel Lovětínský |
2 | 1,390,692 |
|
ELEKTRO - FA. PAVELEK, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,363,934 |
|
D. stavby, s.r.o. |
6 | 1,338,300 |
|
Odtahová služba Říha s.r.o. |
1 | 1,318,750 |
|
ARBO-Linné, s.r.o. |
2 | 1,273,386 |
|
ELSET, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,225,000 |
|
ATTIS software s.r.o. |
1 | 1,190,000 |
|
NIDUS Real, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,185,600 |
|
MIJAPO s.r.o. |
1 | 1,090,000 |
|
TUBEKO SPORT, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,082,252 |
|
Yggdrasilmont, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,047,196 |
|
IN SPACE s.r.o. |
1 | 1,043,900 |
|
ONplan lab, s.r.o. |
1 | 995,600 |
|
BAMACO s.r.o |
1 | 920,347 |
|
Bohumil Hauptmann |
1 | 906,654 |
|
ASITIS s.r.o. |
1 | 876,000 |
|
MEGA a.s. |
1 | 795,862 |
|
AWEA s.r.o. |
1 | 777,666 |
|
Projektový ateliér DAVID s.r.o. |
1 | 775,000 |
|
SB 11, s.r.o. |
1 | 763,200 |
|
SPANTIK CZ s.r.o. |
3 | 754,158 |
|
KANONA a.s. |
1 | 752,180 |
|
DESIGN 4 - projekty staveb, s.r.o. |
1 | 740,000 |
|
MICHAELA NIEDOBOVA |
2 | 723,356 |
|
ZLINER s.r.o. |
1 | 698,000 |
|
GEOVAP, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 660,000 |
|
ElektroRadce.cz |
1 | 637,938 |
|
GASTRO Klimatech s.r.o. |
1 | 610,000 |
|
ART Vision spol. s r.o. |
1 | 598,989 |
|
Ing. arch. Jan Heller |
1 | 572,000 |
|
Šulc stavební společnost s.r.o. |
1 | 546,140 |
|
Moore Czech Republic s.r.o. |
1 | 530,400 |
|
Photon Water Technology s. r. o. |
1 | 500,146 |
|
AUTO KOUTEK s.r.o. |
1 | 499,900 |
|
ANZA s.r.o. |
1 | 494,900 |
|
OL ENERGY s.r.o. |
1 | 469,981 |
|
Daniel Mládek |
2 | 464,062 |
|
PROFI AUTO CZ a.s. |
1 | 459,943 |
|
ABCD Služby školám s.r.o. |
1 | 432,384 |
|
PEMA VELKOOBCHOD s.r.o. |
1 | 400,820 |
|
GASTRO MACH, s.r.o. |
1 | 394,500 |
|
LIPA VELKOOBCHOD PAPÍREM s.r.o. |
1 | 391,845 |
|
Benpra servis s.r.o. |
1 | 388,025 |
|
GDPR posouzení s.r.o. |
1 | 355,200 |
|
pan König René |
1 | 350,000 |
|
MERCI, s.r.o. |
1 | 342,711 |
|
emam s.r.o. |
1 | 341,576 |
|
PIKHARTSPORTSERVIS s.r.o. |
1 | 332,135 |
|
OKNOSTYL group s.r.o. |
1 | 330,000 |
|
W-INVEST WŰNSCH s.r.o. |
1 | 329,000 |
|
BUNG CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 323,000 |
|
C SYSTEM CZ a.s. |
1 | 305,900 |
|
GaREP, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 300,000 |
|
SASASTAV GROUP s.r.o. |
1 | 299,356 |
|
INVESTING CZ spol. s r.o. |
1 | 298,000 |
|
ASTAV GROUP, s.r.o. |
1 | 293,485 |
|
M3 Stavby v.o.s. |
1 | 278,500 |
|
Stavo S v.o.s. |
2 | 272,700 |
|
SEGAS-OIL, S.R.O. |
1 | 255,389 |
|
P.V. Service, spol.s.r.o. |
1 | 228,953 |
|
GEOPEN, s.r.o. |
1 | 214,400 |
|
Technické služby města Liberce a.s. |
1 | 199,838 |
|
ALESTRA s.r.o. |
1 | 163,628 |
|
MIRRO s.r.o. |
1 | 110,000 |
|
EKO Broumovsko s.r.o. |
1 | 89,915 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 19% (4 from 21) |
| Nonprice competition | 27% (21 from 77) |
| Division into lots | 3% (2 from 77) |
| E-auction and DPS | 0% (0 from 77) |
| Innovative procedure | 1% (1 from 77) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 1,156,249,319 |
| Small scale tenders | 248,410,038 |
| Unregulated purchases | 3,600,048,610 |
| Total | 5,004,707,968 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 1,834,087,822 |
| Material consumption | 122,291,987 |
| Energy consumption | 168,732,413 |
| Other consumption | 31,121,346 |
| Sold goods | 6,688,476 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 754,230,025 |
| Travel costs | 4,090,386 |
| Representation costs | 5,573,294 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 1,987,860,933 |
| Small long-term property costs | 69,455,805 |
| Other costs | 20,575,483 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
| Name | Misconduct |
|---|---|
| Poskytování poradenských služeb 2017 a 2018 | YES |
| Rekonstrukce objektu Uran, Liberec | NO |
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce Liebiegova paláce pro potřeby polyfunkčního komunitního centra - Centrum aktivního života - stavba Contract modification |
168,185,876 | 29,529,123 (+18%) |
|
Vodojem Horská a zásobní řady - stavební práce Contract modification |
52,862,418 | 7,866,105 (+15%) |
|
Sociální bydlení města Liberce Bytový dům E - stavební práce Contract modification |
29,950,000 | 3,943,559 (+14%) |
|
Projekční práce na rekonstrukci a stavební úpravy Městského plaveckého bazénu v Liberci Contract modification |
6,770,111 | 2,654,020 (+40%) |
|
Sociální bydlení města Liberce Bytový dům C - stavební práce Contract modification |
14,054,116 | 2,449,868 (+18%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 5% |
| Cancelled contracts | 10% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 1.67 |
| Average decision length | 105.70 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 82) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 82) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 82) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 82) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 82) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 82) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (zakázek z 78 ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.71 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 78 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
