Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Litoměřice

IČO 00263958

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Court found no legal misconduct.

28.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC ve vybraných objektech v majetku města Litoměřice
Energy and related services
6
Ø4 in industry
Litoměřice – modernizace a dostavba autobusového nádraží I. etapa
Construction work for buildings relating to road transport
5
Ø6 in industry
Zateplení a výměna otvorových výplní ZŠ U Stadionu a MŠ Masarykova
Construction work
4
Ø5 in industry
Litoměřice – modernizace a dostavba autobusového nádraží I. etapa
Information systems
2
Ø2 in industry
Litoměřice, Palachova ulice - výběr dodavatele stavebních prací
Construction work for highways, roads
12
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Chládek & Tintěra, a.s.
7 79,810,838
AB Facility a.s.
1 48,281,651
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
3 38,505,709
ELTODO, a.s.
1 22,974,704
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 19,890,703
Other suppliers 13 60,685,883

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

80%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (3 from 6)
Nonprice competition 29% (2 from 7)
Division into lots 14% (1 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

62%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 375,661,112
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 613,684,308
Total 989,345,419

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

57%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 18% (4 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 5% (1 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 22)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 22)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 22)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

49%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 81% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.29 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 21 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders