Court found serious misconduct. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Skládka TKO Štěpánovice
Construction work for engineering works except bridges, tunnels, shafts and subways |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
Stavební úpravy technologie SCZT - Pod Hůrkou, Klatovy - II. etapa
Construction work |
11
Ø5 in industry |
|
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu ZŠ Plánická
Construction work |
10
Ø5 in industry |
|
Stavební úpravy technologie SCZT Pod Hůrkou, Klatovy - II. etapa
Construction work |
4
Ø5 in industry |
|
Chodník Točník
Construction work |
5
Ø5 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
Silnice Klatovy a.s. |
9 | 76,398,082 |
|
EUROVIA CS, a.s. |
2 | 29,354,421 |
|
Klatovská stavební společnost s.r.o. |
3 | 25,172,000 |
|
Lesní stavby, s.r.o. |
3 | 22,030,161 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
2 | 17,541,810 |
| Other suppliers | 32 | 148,015,174 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Silnice Klatovy a.s. |
9 | 76,398,082 |
|
EUROVIA CS, a.s. |
2 | 29,354,421 |
|
Klatovská stavební společnost s.r.o. |
3 | 25,172,000 |
|
Lesní stavby, s.r.o. |
3 | 22,030,161 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
2 | 17,541,810 |
|
ERDING, a.s. |
1 | 17,338,843 |
|
SMP CZ, a.s. |
1 | 16,799,000 |
|
TENZA, a.s. |
1 | 16,750,000 |
|
K&K TECHNOLOGY a.s. |
1 | 13,746,071 |
|
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 9,285,852 |
|
ZAHRADNÍ ARCHITEKTURA TÁBOR s.r.o. |
1 | 8,180,284 |
|
SWIETELSKY stavební, s.r.o. |
1 | 7,650,080 |
|
Gardenline s.r.o. |
1 | 7,627,428 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
3 | 7,305,155 |
|
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 6,291,444 |
|
SunnyMont s.r.o. |
1 | 4,957,622 |
|
PRVNÍ CHRÁNĚNÁ DÍLNA s.r.o. |
1 | 4,880,000 |
|
Gabriel s.r.o. |
1 | 3,964,256 |
|
AV MEDIA, a.s. |
1 | 3,290,000 |
|
SECURITY INVESTMENT Klatovy, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,772,000 |
|
KINETIC KT spol. s r. o. |
1 | 2,270,560 |
|
FAGUS spol. s.r.o. |
1 | 2,244,500 |
|
Daniel Dvořák |
1 | 1,884,833 |
|
AQUA PROCON s.r.o. |
1 | 1,760,000 |
|
MOTO-TRUCK CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 1,537,769 |
|
MgA. Ing. arch. Michal Fišer |
2 | 1,346,780 |
|
AUTO NEJDL s.r.o. |
1 | 1,119,000 |
|
Veolia Komodity ČR, s.r.o. |
1 | 938,875 |
|
Pavel Hnilička Architekti, s. r. o. |
1 | 840,000 |
|
OMGEVING cvba |
1 | 810,000 |
|
ASTON - služby v ekologii, s.r.o. |
1 | 785,624 |
|
Odpadové hospodářství Klatovy, s.r.o. |
1 | 694,200 |
|
Bíza Hilský Táborský architekti s.r.o. |
1 | 578,000 |
|
Aulík Fišer architekti, s.r.o. |
1 | 367,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 21% (5 from 24) |
| Nonprice competition | 0% (0 from 24) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 24) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 24) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% ( from 24) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 550,393,896 |
| Small scale tenders | 0 |
| Unregulated purchases | 658,590,897 |
| Total | 1,208,984,793 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 755,956,911 |
| Material consumption | 20,776,546 |
| Energy consumption | 18,496,197 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 848,210 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 238,344,106 |
| Travel costs | 1,433,604 |
| Representation costs | 2,046,240 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 143,690,300 |
| Small long-term property costs | 9,721,634 |
| Other costs | 17,671,045 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
| Name | Misconduct |
|---|---|
| Rekonstrukce veřejného osvětlení v Klatovech | YES |
| Rekonstrukce veřejného osvětlení v Klatovech | NO |
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 25% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.63 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 2% (1 from 60) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 60) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 60) |
| Missing call for tenders | 27% (16 from 60) |
| Missing winning price | 0% ( from 60) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% ( from 60) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 90% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.65 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 52 tenders under the law) |
|
