Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Letohrad

IČO 00279129

Good buyer. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

31.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

43%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce Domu kultury Letohrad
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Lokalita pro bydlení Letohrad - Nad Bažantnicí, II. etapa
Construction work
9
Ø4 in industry
Propojení stávajících cyklostezek Letohrad - Trasa J2 - Cyklostezka podél trati ČD
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce oranžerie - opakované řízení
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Projektová dokumentace - Rekonstrukce Domu kultury Letohrad
Engineering design services
6
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

99%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
VCES a.s.
1 227,278,209
PROFISTAV Litomyšl, a.s.
1 21,482,103
KENVI CZ s.r.o.
4 18,073,093
MADOS MT s.r.o.
1 14,991,441
STATING s.r.o.
1 14,630,630
Other suppliers 31 342,045,982

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

97%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 352,224,847
Small scale tenders 63,468,201
Unregulated purchases 22,237,411
Total 437,930,459

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Výstavba garáží, 1. etapa
Outside directive scope
- 7,487,164

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 31% (4 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

56%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 77% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.62 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 4 tenders
500K-1000K 9 tenders
1000K+ 16 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.