Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Letohrad

IČO 00279129

Good buyer. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Rekonstrukce Domu kultury Letohrad
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Lokalita pro bydlení Letohrad - Nad Bažantnicí, II. etapa
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Propojení stávajících cyklostezek Letohrad - Trasa J2 - Cyklostezka podél trati ČD
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce oranžerie - opakované řízení
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Projektová dokumentace - Rekonstrukce Domu kultury Letohrad
Engineering design services
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
VCES a.s.
1 227,278,209
PROFISTAV Litomyšl, a.s.
1 21,482,103
KENVI CZ s.r.o.
4 18,073,093
MADOS MT s.r.o.
1 14,991,441
STATING s.r.o.
1 14,630,630
Other suppliers 31 342,045,982

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 352,224,847
Small scale tenders 63,468,201
Unregulated purchases 22,237,411
Total 437,930,459

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Výstavba garáží, 1. etapa
Outside directive scope
- 7,487,164

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 31% (4 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 77% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.62 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 4 tenders
500K-1000K 9 tenders
1000K+ 16 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.