Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Kladno

IČO 00234516

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

18.
ranking
72%
zIndex
Show average values  
16%
Bidder participation
95%
Winner concentration
58%
Pro-competitive tools
85%
Public procurement share on total purchases
88%
Legal misconduct
92%
Competitive contracting
55%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
55%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

16%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Dlouhodobé zajištění dopravní obslužnosti Statutárního města Kladna a příměstských oblastí městskou autobusovou dopravou
Public road transport services
2
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce Zimního stadionu Kladno
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Zajištění provozu hřbitovů na území Statutárního města Kladno II
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Zimní stadión Kladno - stavební úpravy 3. NP
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budov a realizace systému nuceného větrání s rekuperací učeben ZŠ Kladno, Norská 2633 - Zvýšení energetických úspor ZŠ a MŠ Kladno, Norská 2633 - Pavilony A, B, D, E, F
Construction work
8
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

95%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ČSAD MHD Kladno a.s.
 1 1,573,595,591
S u b t e r r a a.s.
 7 284,289,452
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s.
 3 80,130,250
ARTEA CZ, a.s.
 11 60,545,211
Petr Pokorný
 1 54,968,000
Other suppliers 238 2,584,673,769

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

58%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 46% (17 from 37)
Nonprice competition 16% (9 from 57)
Division into lots 21% (12 from 57)
E-auction 2% (1 from 57)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 57)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

85%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 2,653,776,101
Small scale tenders 753,577,950
Unregulated purchases 1,358,860,753
Total 4,766,214,804

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

92%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Zimní stadion Kladno - úprava uložení střešní konstrukce
Technical exclusivity 		- 39,451,625
Rekonstrukce a stavební úpravy objektu Základní školy Kladno, Brjanská 3078 se zaměřením na modernizaci ICT, vybavení přírodovědných učeben a dílen včetně zajištění bezbariérovosti II.
Contract modification 		15,369,061 2,123,485 (+14%)
Stavební úpravy pavilonu IV. MŠ Svojsíkova Kladno II
Contract modification 		7,454,508 1,378,451 (+19%)
Stavební úpravy objektu č. p. 2338 na mateřskou školu II.
Contract modification 		25,201,236 1,017,286 (+5%)
Zimní stadión Kladno - Vzduchotechnika
Contract modification 		18,561,503 350,266 (+2%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

55%
average 56%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 11%
Cancelled contracts 9%
Average requirements modifications count 1.54
Average decision length 100.79 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 65)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 65)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 65)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 65)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 65)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 65)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

55%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.66 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 59 tenders under the law)
0-250K 3 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 73 tenders
1000K+ 101 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.