Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Vrchlabí

IČO 00278475

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Sportovně rekreační areál Vejsplachy - krytý bazén vč. infrastruktury
Construction work for sports facilities
Ø4 in industry
Vrchlabí - Krkonošská ulice - II. etapa
Road construction works
Ø6 in industry
Ulice Kalvárie, stavební úpravy
Construction work for highways, roads
Ø5 in industry
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC ve vybraných budovách města Vrchlabí
Energy and related services
Ø2 in industry
Sportovně rekreační areál Vejsplachy, Vrchlabí - krytý bazén -1.etapa - infrastruktura
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav DIZ s.r.o.
1 188,211,768
OnSite Power 4 s.r.o.
1 50,253,825
2 46,420,293
ENESA a.s.
1 17,081,452
STAS, s.r.o.
1 15,764,382
Other suppliers 70 460,090,093

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 5% (1 from 19)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 19)
E-auction 0% (0 from 19)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 19)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 474,216,373
Small scale tenders 111,362,419
Unregulated purchases 128,879,260
Total 714,458,051

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Sportovně rekreační areál Vejsplachy, Vrchlabí- krytý bazén-energoblok 3
- 50,253,825

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 24)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 24)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 24)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 24)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 24)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 24)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.79 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 24 tenders under the law)
0-250K 18 tenders
250K-500K 7 tenders
500K-1000K 12 tenders
1000K+ 23 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.