Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Vrchlabí

IČO 00278475

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

105.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

29%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Sportovně rekreační areál Vejsplachy - krytý bazén vč. infrastruktury
Construction work for sports facilities
3
Ø4 in industry
Vrchlabí - Krkonošská ulice - II. etapa
Road construction works
2
Ø6 in industry
Ulice Kalvárie, stavební úpravy
Construction work for highways, roads
1
Ø5 in industry
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC ve vybraných budovách města Vrchlabí
Energy and related services
2
Ø2 in industry
Sportovně rekreační areál Vejsplachy, Vrchlabí - krytý bazén -1.etapa - infrastruktura
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
5
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

97%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav DIZ s.r.o.
1 188,211,768
OnSite Power 4 s.r.o.
1 50,253,825
M-SILNICE a.s.
2 46,420,293
ENESA a.s.
1 17,081,452
STAS, s.r.o.
1 15,764,382
Other suppliers 70 460,090,093

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

25%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 5% (1 from 19)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 19)
E-auction 0% (0 from 19)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 19)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

91%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 474,216,373
Small scale tenders 111,362,419
Unregulated purchases 128,879,260
Total 714,458,051

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

59%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Sportovně rekreační areál Vejsplachy, Vrchlabí- krytý bazén-energoblok 3
Emergency
- 50,253,825

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 24)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 24)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 24)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 24)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 24)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 24)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

67%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.79 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 24 tenders under the law)
0-250K 18 tenders
250K-500K 7 tenders
500K-1000K 12 tenders
1000K+ 23 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.