Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
Blansko, Salmova 17 – energetické úspory
Stavební práce |
6
Ø5 in industry |
Snížení energetické náročnosti městského úřadu v Blansku
Stavební úpravy prostorů pro zaměstnance |
5
Ø5 in industry |
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy ZŠ Dvorská 26, Blansko
Stavební úpravy školních budov |
4
Ø5 in industry |
Blansko, ulice Nádraží, parkoviště osobních automobilů
Stavební práce |
5
Ø5 in industry |
Výměna zdroje vytápění v objektu ZŠ a MŠ Salmova, Blansko
Tepelná čerpadla |
3
Ø3 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
Stavkom, spol. s r. o. |
1 | 19,825,740 |
Dopravní stavby Brno, s.r.o. |
2 | 17,709,615 |
Reko a.s. |
1 | 13,591,887 |
Letostav, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 13,494,690 |
Cergomont s.r.o. |
1 | 7,979,699 |
Other suppliers | 11 | 27,971,226 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Stavkom, spol. s r. o. |
1 | 19,825,740 |
Dopravní stavby Brno, s.r.o. |
2 | 17,709,615 |
Reko a.s. |
1 | 13,591,887 |
Letostav, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 13,494,690 |
Cergomont s.r.o. |
1 | 7,979,699 |
Suez Využití zdrojů a.s. |
1 | 5,705,680 |
Strabag a.s. |
1 | 4,218,938 |
Awt Rekultivace a.s. |
2 | 3,636,098 |
Vestav group s.r.o. |
1 | 3,293,681 |
Uneco optima s.r.o. |
1 | 3,217,852 |
Inženýrské stavby Brno, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 2,805,588 |
Ep Energy Trading, a.s. |
1 | 2,228,120 |
Gordic spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,880,930 |
Petr Vykrut |
1 | 984,339 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 0) |
Nonprice competition | 0% (0 from 8) |
Division into lots | 0% (0 from 8) |
E-auction | 0% (0 from 8) |
Innovative procedure | 0% ( from 8) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
---|---|
Public procurement | 100,572,860 |
Small scale tenders | 0 |
Unregulated purchases | 933,849,068 |
Total | 1,034,421,928 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Stavební práce – Demolice hotelu Dukla - vícepráce 01 Dodatečné práce |
- | 69,174 |
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu mateřské školy Údolní v Blansku - dodatečné stavební práce Dodatečné práce |
- | Not disclosed |
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Stavební práce – Demolice hotelu Dukla - vícepráce 01 Dodatečné práce |
- | 69,174 |
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu mateřské školy Údolní v Blansku - dodatečné stavební práce Dodatečné práce |
- | Not disclosed |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Type of flaw | Result |
---|---|
Issued tenders without published result | 8% |
Cancelled contracts | 25% |
Average requirements modifications count | 0.08 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 18) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 18) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 18) |
Missing call for tenders | 11% (2 from 18) |
Missing winning price | 0% ( from 18) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% ( from 18) |
Contract | Type of flaw |
---|---|
Cyklistické stezky a pěší komunikace podél řeky Svitavy - IV. etapa | Missing call for tenders |
RPS - Blansko, Regenerace sídliště Sever III. etapa | Missing call for tenders |
Stavební práce – Demolice hotelu Dukla - vícepráce 01 | Final or estimated price not published |
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu mateřské školy Údolní v Blansku - dodatečné stavební práce | Final or estimated price not published |
Regenerace vybraných ploch zeleně v Blansku | Final or estimated price not published |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 48% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 2.17 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law) |
|
Do the risky firms win frequently? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award | 0% (0 from 18) |
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement | 0% (0 from 18) |
Subcontractor share above 50 % | 6% (1 from 18) |
Supplier demise shortly after contract | 0% (0 from 18) |
Supplier bankruptcy | 0% (0 from 18) |
Supplier donating to political party | 22% (4 from 18) |
Supplier did not publish financial results on time | 33% (6 from 18) |