Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Cheb

IČO 00253979

Enough firms are competing for contracts. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Show average values  
62%
Bidder participation
87%
Winner concentration
36%
Pro-competitive tools
59%
Public procurement share on total purchases
90%
Legal misconduct
73%
Competitive contracting
60%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
58%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Lávka pro pěší přes kolejiště nádraží v Chebu - III
Various surface works
2
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budov 3. základní školy, Cheb
Construction work
8
Ø4 in industry
Přírodovědné centrum při DDM Sova Cheb
Construction work for buildings relating to education and research
7
Ø4 in industry
Úprava komunikace Cheb-Háje, ul. Zemědělská - 2
Road construction works
6
Ø6 in industry
Cyklostezka Cheb – Dřenice – I. etapa
Paths and other metalled surfaces
7
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

87%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ALGON, a.s.
 11 114,079,457
Raeder & Falge s.r.o.
 1 98,779,923
3xN spol. s r.o.
 1 49,338,633
Stavební společnost VARO, s.r.o.
 1 27,202,887
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
 1 22,727,273
Other suppliers 146 561,311,074

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

36%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 18% (8 from 44)
Nonprice competition 9% (7 from 77)
Division into lots 9% (7 from 77)
E-auction 0% (0 from 77)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 77)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 705,480,904
Small scale tenders 120,665,005
Unregulated purchases 1,552,292,816
Total 2,378,438,724

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

73%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Lávka pro pěší přes kolejiště nádraží v Chebu - III
Contract modification 		98,779,923 20,401,018 (+21%)
PD - Rekonstrukce a přístavba městské knihovny v Chebu
Authorship rights 		- 8,531,000
Dodávka tepelné energie pro zimní stadion
Technical exclusivity 		- 5,127,360
Dodávka tepelné energie do obytných domů v ulici Sládkova, Cheb
Technical exclusivity 		- 2,754,000
Pojištění majetku a odpovědnosti za škody města Chebu
Contract modification 		6,826,288 1,035,636 (+16%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 56%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 23%
Average requirements modifications count 1.10
Average decision length 51.15 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 82)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 82)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 82)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 82)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 82)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 1% (1 from 82)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

58%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 99% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.34 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 80 tenders under the law)
0-250K 23 tenders
250K-500K 20 tenders
500K-1000K 22 tenders
1000K+ 19 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.