Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Mnichovo Hradiště

IČO 00238309

The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

43%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Svoz a nakládání s odpadem města Mnichovo Hradiště
Refuse collection services
1
Ø1 in industry
REVITALIZACE MASARYKOVA NÁMĚSTÍ V MNICHOVĚ HRADIŠTI
Construction work for buildings relating to road transport
9
Ø5 in industry
ROZŠÍŘENÍ KAPACIT MŠ MÍROVÁ V MNICHOVĚ HRADIŠTI
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Přestupní terminál veřejné dopravy v Mnichově Hradišti
Construction work for buildings relating to road transport
2
Ø5 in industry
Podpora bezpečnosti dopravy v Mnichově Hradišti 2019
Installation works of walkways
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

99%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
COMPAG MLADÁ BOLESLAV s.r.o.
1 83,832,489
H-INTES s.r.o.
1 41,442,318
MARHOLD a.s.
1 30,498,999
Metrostav a.s.
1 22,994,767
SaM silnice a mosty a.s.
1 16,853,738
Other suppliers 17 158,770,379

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

16%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 19)
Division into lots 11% (2 from 19)
E-auction 5% (1 from 19)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 19)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

73%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 350,554,375
Small scale tenders 9,444,525
Unregulated purchases 324,287,499
Total 684,286,399

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
REVITALIZACE MASARYKOVA NÁMĚSTÍ V MNICHOVĚ HRADIŠTI
Contract modification
41,442,318 4,687,597 (+12%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

36%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 74% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.42 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 3 tenders
1000K+ 2 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.