Court found no legal misconduct. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Revitalizace sídliště Portyč Písek – 2. Etapa + rozšíření
Stavební práce |
8
Ø5 in industry |
|
Sdružené dodávky elektrické energie pro město Písek, jeho příspěvkové organizace a společnosti s majetkovou účastí města
Elektrická energie |
Not disclosed
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce MK v Písku - Třída Národní svobody
Práce na stavbě silnic |
12
Ø6 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce a modernizace ulic Šafaříkova a Dobrovského - 1. etapa v Písku
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace |
7
Ø5 in industry |
|
REKONSTRUKCE TECHNICKÉ PAMÁTKY SLADOVNA NA EXPOZICI SLADOVNICTVÍ – 6. ETAPA; REKONSTRUKCE SLADOVNY 7. ETAPA – GALERIE DĚTSKÝ SVĚT
Stavební úpravy uměleckých a kulturních budov |
2
Ø3 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
Casta dopravní stavby s.r.o. |
8 | 76,890,383 |
|
Strabag a.s. |
7 | 64,259,311 |
|
Kočí a.s. |
3 | 53,617,707 |
|
E.on Energie, a.s. |
2 | 28,983,858 |
|
Colas Cz, a.s. |
1 | 24,418,266 |
| Other suppliers | 21 | 123,820,879 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Casta dopravní stavby s.r.o. |
8 | 76,890,383 |
|
Strabag a.s. |
7 | 64,259,311 |
|
Kočí a.s. |
3 | 53,617,707 |
|
E.on Energie, a.s. |
2 | 28,983,858 |
|
Colas Cz, a.s. |
1 | 24,418,266 |
|
Enesa a.s. |
1 | 20,656,000 |
|
Centropol Energy, a.s. |
1 | 18,391,163 |
|
Česká pojišťovna a.s. |
2 | 15,612,780 |
|
Skanska a.s. |
1 | 14,273,250 |
|
Mvv Energie Cz a.s. |
1 | 10,551,907 |
|
Protom Strakonice, s.r.o. |
1 | 7,966,161 |
|
Stafis-kt s.r.o. |
1 | 7,558,606 |
|
Projektil Architekti s.r.o. |
2 | 6,530,000 |
|
Mozis s.r.o. |
1 | 5,149,576 |
|
Ekoeko s.r.o. |
1 | 4,880,000 |
|
Zeppelin Cz s.r.o. |
1 | 4,455,700 |
|
Zdeněk Patera |
1 | 1,964,000 |
|
Zvánovec a.s. |
1 | 1,697,241 |
|
Ekostar spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,576,315 |
|
Veolia Komodity Čr, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,051,520 |
|
Ing.arch. Vávra Petr |
1 | 898,900 |
|
Atelier Vltava s.r.o. |
1 | 359,000 |
|
Mca atelier s.r.o. |
1 | 148,760 |
|
A Plus a.s. |
1 | 100,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (3 from 0) |
| Nonprice competition | 11% (2 from 19) |
| Division into lots | 11% (2 from 19) |
| E-auction and DPS | 5% (1 from 19) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% ( from 19) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 372,407,214 |
| Small scale tenders | 0 |
| Unregulated purchases | 604,568,169 |
| Total | 976,975,383 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Nákup elektřiny z napěťové hladiny NN na Komoditní Burze PROFIT pro Město Písek, Město Tábor a Město Chýnov a příspěvkové organizace, jejichž zřizovatelem je uvedená města a obchodní společnosti, které uvedená města ovládají. Not disclosed |
- | 18,391,163 |
|
Cyklostezka Písek – Smrkovice, 1. jednací řízení bez uveřejnění Not disclosed |
- | 10,196,120 |
|
Sanace/dekontaminace pavilonu tělocvičen na ZŠ J. K. Tyla, Písek Krajní naléhavost |
- | 1,576,315 |
|
Rekonstrukce Dobrovského ulice v Písku - 2. etapa - dodatečné stavební práce Dodatečné práce |
- | 1,160,622 |
|
Nákup elektřiny z napěťové hladiny VN na Komoditní Burze PROFIT pro Městské služby Písek s.r.o. Not disclosed |
- | 1,051,520 |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 21% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.87 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 10% (4 from 42) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 42) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 42) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 42) |
| Missing winning price | 0% ( from 42) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% ( from 42) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 50% (zakázek z ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.48 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law) |
|
Do the risky firms win frequently? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award | 0% (0 from 42) |
| Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement | 0% (0 from 42) |
| Subcontractor share above 50 % | 5% (2 from 42) |
| Supplier demise shortly after contract | 0% (0 from 42) |
| Supplier bankruptcy | 0% (0 from 42) |
| Supplier donating to political party | 0% (0 from 42) |
| Supplier did not publish financial results on time | 29% (12 from 42) |
