Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Písek

IČO 00249998

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce objektu č.p.1556 Sovova ul. v Písku na zařízení pobytových služeb pro seniory
Construction work
0
Ø4 in industry
Sdružené služby dodávky elektrické energie pro město Písek a s ním sdružené zadavatele na období dodávky let 2022-2025 formou postupného nákupu
Electricity
4
Ø2 in industry
Stanice energetického využití kalu a biomasy I. etapa- ČOV Písek
Miscellaneous special-purpose machinery
2
Ø1 in industry
Rekonstrukce lávky přes městský ostrov
Construction work for bridges
3
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce Zeyerovy ulice - vodohospodářská část
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

95%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
E.ON Energie, a.s.
1 49,291,563
KDS - stavební s.r.o.
2 46,646,338
Microenergy s.r.o.
1 40,845,958
K&K TECHNOLOGY a.s.
1 36,457,315
KOČÍ a.s.
2 34,189,906
Other suppliers 55 352,284,739

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

28%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 8% (1 from 13)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 25)
Division into lots 12% (3 from 25)
E-auction 8% (2 from 25)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 25)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

61%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 712,886,054
Small scale tenders 112,188,714
Unregulated purchases 1,401,326,021
Total 2,226,400,789

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

55%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Sdružené služby dodávky elektrické energie pro město Písek a s ním sdružené zadavatele na období dodávky od 1.1.2022 do 31.12.2022
Emergency
- 49,291,563
Nástupní prostor - Nemocnice Písek
Contract modification
24,382,192 1,462,035 (+6%)
Písek - Zeyerova ulice
Contract modification
14,674,957 998,432 (+7%)
Rekonstrukce Zeyerovy ulice - vodohospodářská část
Contract modification
25,950,982 316,197 (+2%)

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 26)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 26)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 26)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 26)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 26)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 26)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

70%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.04 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 23 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 7 tenders
500K-1000K 7 tenders
1000K+ 26 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.