Large cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Písek

IČO 00249998

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

50%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nový plavecký bazén v Písku
Construction work for sports facilities
0
Ø3 in industry
Úpravna vody Písek
Construction works for plants, mining and manufacturing and for buildings relating to the oil and gas industry
4
Ø4 in industry
Městská knihovna Písek a centrum vzdělávání
Construction work for buildings relating to education and research
3
Ø3 in industry
Cyklistická stezka a chodník Hradiště – průmyslová zóna a centrum města Písek; objekt č. 2 – lávka pro cyklisty a pěší II.
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce Zeyerovy ulice - vodohospodářská část
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 90%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SMP CZ, a.s.
1 178,739,437
OHL ŽS, a.s.
1 132,646,700
Metrostav a.s.
3 63,875,907
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
3 43,150,505
Casta dopravní stavby s.r.o.
2 38,528,359
Other suppliers 70 203,764,654

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

38%
average 42%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (6 from 18)
Nonprice competition 6% (2 from 34)
Division into lots 6% (2 from 34)
E-auction 6% (2 from 34)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 34)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

56%
average 55%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 592,252,111
Small scale tenders 79,084,588
Unregulated purchases 1,497,278,714
Total 2,168,615,414

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Úpravna vody Písek
Contract modification
178,739,437 2,392,048 (+2%)
Stavební úpravy a přístavba chaty Živec č.p. 440 na parc. č. st. 2077, 2503, 2467/1 k.ú. Písek
Contract modification
14,909,401 1,650,950 (+12%)
Nástupní prostor - Nemocnice Písek
Contract modification
24,382,192 1,462,035 (+6%)
Regenerace panelového sídliště Jih v Písku 3. etapa
Contract modification
9,636,748 398,250 (+5%)
Cyklistická stezka a chodník Hradiště – průmyslová zóna a centrum města Písek; objekt č. 2 – lávka pro cyklisty a pěší II.
Contract modification
39,779,998 330,279 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

38%
average 61%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 31%
Average requirements modifications count 1.94
Average decision length 67.29 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 34)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 34)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 34)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 34)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 34)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 34)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 58%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.09 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 32 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 12 tenders
500K-1000K 14 tenders
1000K+ 25 tenders