Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Mariánské Lázně

IČO 00254061

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dům Chopin - rekonstrukce objektu - 2. etapa
Restoration work
4
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce chlazení zimního stadionu v Mariánských Lázních
Cooling and ventilation equipment
2
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce veřejného osvětlení a nové infrastruktury v Mariánských Lázních
Building installation work
0
Ø3 in industry
Dům Chopin - rekonstrukce objektu - 1. etapa
Restoration work
7
Ø4 in industry
Oprava asfaltových krytů frézováním místních komunikací v Mariánských Lázních
Construction work for highways, roads
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

72%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stavební společnost VARO, s.r.o.
2 71,675,010
BRNOFROST spol. s r.o.
1 30,930,000
Silnice Horšovský Týn a.s.
1 9,690,000
Stavby Vildt s.r.o
6 8,761,536
PROMO REAL GROUP s.r.o.
2 8,399,760
Other suppliers 51 172,515,973

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 121,356,586
Small scale tenders 73,765,757
Unregulated purchases 671,006,807
Total 866,129,150

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

72%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nájem nebytových prostor_3. ZŘ_JŘBU
Previous tender without bids
- 6,125,515
Dům Chopin - rekonstrukce objektu - 1. etapa
Contract modification
19,846,092 4,178,757 (+22%)
Rekonstrukce školních dílen na Základní škole Úšovice v Mariánských Lázních – dodávka nábytku a pomůcek
Contract modification
2,388,560 98 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 7% (1 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 14)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 14)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 14)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

88%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.14 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 7 tenders
250K-500K 9 tenders
500K-1000K 15 tenders
1000K+ 17 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.