Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Kutná Hora

IČO 00236195

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

21.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Sportovní hala Klimeška - 3. etapa
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace Sankturinovského domu v Kutné Hoře - Generální zhotovitel stavby- Dodatek SOD Č.6
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce MŠ Trebišovská v Kutné Hoře
Construction work for kindergarten buildings
7
Ø4 in industry
Kutná Hora, Masarykova ulice-rekonstrukce chodníků - Dodatek SOD č.5
Paths and other metalled surfaces
6
Ø4 in industry
Realizace varovných protipovodňových opatření pro město Kutná Hora
Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting
3
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

97%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
BFK service a.s.
1 33,329,837
UNISTAV CONSTRUCTION a.s.
1 31,749,988
Realitní a stavební společnost s.r.o.
2 22,822,221
CE-DA servis s.r.o.
1 13,691,211
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
3 13,498,885
Other suppliers 79 243,561,793

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

30%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 6)
Nonprice competition 10% (2 from 20)
Division into lots 10% (2 from 20)
E-auction 10% (2 from 20)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 20)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

62%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 407,113,514
Small scale tenders 100,677,679
Unregulated purchases 830,948,050
Total 1,338,739,244

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

90%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Revitalizace Sankturinovského domu v Kutné Hoře - Generální zhotovitel stavby- Dodatek SOD Č.6
Contract modification
31,749,988 4,387,515 (+14%)
Rekonstrukce MŠ Trebišovská v Kutné Hoře
Contract modification
16,555,555 1,045,223 (+7%)
„Realizace expozic ve Vlašském dvoře v rámci projektu ‚Revitalizace NKP Vlašský dvůr‘“
Contract modification
10,307,582 112,180 (+2%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50
Average decision length 77.83 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 23)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 23)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 23)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 23)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 23)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 4% (1 from 23)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

67%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 87% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.65 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 23 tenders under the law)
0-250K 8 tenders
250K-500K 19 tenders
500K-1000K 18 tenders
1000K+ 13 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.