Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Sportovní hala Klimeška - 3. etapa
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
Revitalizace Sankturinovského domu v Kutné Hoře - Generální zhotovitel stavby- Dodatek SOD Č.6
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce MŠ Trebišovská v Kutné Hoře
Construction work for kindergarten buildings |
7
Ø4 in industry |
|
Kutná Hora, Masarykova ulice-rekonstrukce chodníků - Dodatek SOD č.5
Paths and other metalled surfaces |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
Realizace varovných protipovodňových opatření pro město Kutná Hora
Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting |
3
Ø1 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
BFK service a.s. |
1 | 33,329,837 |
|
UNISTAV CONSTRUCTION a.s. |
1 | 31,749,988 |
|
Realitní a stavební společnost s.r.o. |
2 | 22,822,221 |
|
CE-DA servis s.r.o. |
1 | 13,691,211 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
3 | 13,498,885 |
| Other suppliers | 79 | 243,561,793 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
BFK service a.s. |
1 | 33,329,837 |
|
UNISTAV CONSTRUCTION a.s. |
1 | 31,749,988 |
|
Realitní a stavební společnost s.r.o. |
2 | 22,822,221 |
|
CE-DA servis s.r.o. |
1 | 13,691,211 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
3 | 13,498,885 |
|
TELMO a.s. |
1 | 13,468,201 |
|
STAVONEL, spol. s r.o. |
3 | 12,875,857 |
|
Konstrukce a dopravní stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 11,870,000 |
|
H & B delta, s.r.o. |
1 | 10,866,404 |
|
Alpiq Retail CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 9,712,801 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 9,209,305 |
|
" M plus " spol. s r.o. |
1 | 7,599,220 |
|
WANDEL CZECH s.r.o. |
1 | 7,577,713 |
|
ELKOPLAST CZ, s.r.o. |
2 | 6,384,000 |
|
Hydro Gas Manufacture, s.r.o. |
1 | 6,309,638 |
|
Air Technology s.r.o. |
1 | 5,589,749 |
|
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
1 | 5,421,251 |
|
GEMOS DOPRAVNÍ SYSTÉMY a.s. |
1 | 3,456,000 |
|
EKOSTARMONT s.r.o. |
1 | 3,452,509 |
|
Stavitelství NV s.r.o. |
1 | 3,246,117 |
|
DALFOS s.r.o. |
3 | 3,016,970 |
|
PERFECT ICE s.r.o. |
1 | 2,729,922 |
|
GREEN PROJECT s.r.o. |
1 | 1,959,779 |
|
TISKÁRNA GRAFIA GRYČ, s.r.o. |
3 | 1,950,795 |
|
A.G.J. - chráněná dílna s.r.o. |
1 | 1,864,310 |
|
AQ audio studio s.r.o. |
1 | 1,738,362 |
|
K+T stavební s.r.o. |
2 | 1,701,716 |
|
Masák & Partner, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,580,000 |
|
Skuhravý Jaroslav |
1 | 1,520,119 |
|
ŠINDLAR s. r. o. |
1 | 1,496,000 |
|
ROKOS STAVBY s.r.o. |
1 | 1,187,536 |
|
Raamar, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,187,492 |
|
Lesprojekt Stará Boleslav s.r.o. |
1 | 972,726 |
|
ELEKTRO MOSEV spol. s r.o. |
1 | 972,000 |
|
pokorny film s.r.o. |
1 | 970,000 |
|
INGPOS s.r.o. |
1 | 965,937 |
|
ZRUP Příbram a.s. |
1 | 964,211 |
|
VÝTAHY VANĚRKA s.r.o. |
1 | 957,029 |
|
Kutnohorská stavební, s.r.o. |
1 | 889,965 |
|
Peter Nožina |
1 | 830,000 |
|
LANOSTAV OBNOVA PAMÁTEK s.r.o. |
1 | 778,682 |
|
Zdeněk Němec |
1 | 739,867 |
|
MEGATOP s.r.o. |
1 | 711,329 |
|
Ondřej Tunkl |
1 | 692,693 |
|
LUNA PROGRESS s.r.o. |
1 | 683,900 |
|
AVE Kolín s.r.o. |
1 | 681,771 |
|
Technické služby Kutná Hora, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 670,594 |
|
VV AUTO, s.r.o. |
2 | 546,521 |
|
Ing. Martin Nepraš |
1 | 493,000 |
|
ARTENDR s.r.o. |
1 | 480,000 |
|
Vodohospodářský rozvoj a výstavba a.s. zkráceně VRV a.s. |
1 | 478,000 |
|
SPORT CLUB s.r.o. |
1 | 455,000 |
|
Window Holding a.s. |
1 | 424,797 |
|
OKNOSTYL group s.r.o. |
1 | 410,000 |
|
Ing.arch. Eva Macholánová |
1 | 396,000 |
|
U N I K O M, a.s. |
1 | 384,215 |
|
M.C.TRITON, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 384,000 |
|
REINVEST spol. s r.o. |
1 | 358,000 |
|
T.S.R.ACT, s. r. o. |
1 | 352,500 |
|
Balder Invest s.r.o. |
1 | 336,912 |
|
PLASTOVÁ OKNA HEŘMANŮV MĚSTEC s.r.o. |
1 | 317,489 |
|
BFS Industry, s.r.o. |
1 | 289,000 |
|
"ETNA" spol. s r.o. |
1 | 273,557 |
|
Ing. Luboš Křivánek |
1 | 259,000 |
|
GREGOR - projekt invest, s.r.o. |
1 | 253,000 |
|
Louda Auto a.s. |
1 | 206,612 |
|
AS PROJECT CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 176,800 |
|
KANTOR-BLAŽEK, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 121,425 |
|
SCC CZECH s.r.o. |
1 | 104,500 |
|
Jiří Dostál |
1 | 97,450 |
|
Ing. Jiří Kulič |
1 | 85,000 |
|
PERFECTED s.r.o. |
1 | 49,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 6) |
| Nonprice competition | 10% (2 from 20) |
| Division into lots | 10% (2 from 20) |
| E-auction | 10% (2 from 20) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 20) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 407,113,514 |
| Small scale tenders | 100,677,679 |
| Unregulated purchases | 830,948,050 |
| Total | 1,338,739,244 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 532,749,331 |
| Material consumption | 23,545,305 |
| Energy consumption | 109,000,257 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 3,433,818 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 200,235,604 |
| Travel costs | 1,397,684 |
| Representation costs | 1,312,395 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 426,016,886 |
| Small long-term property costs | 19,900,423 |
| Other costs | 21,147,540 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Revitalizace Sankturinovského domu v Kutné Hoře - Generální zhotovitel stavby- Dodatek SOD Č.6 Contract modification |
31,749,988 | 4,387,515 (+14%) |
|
Rekonstrukce MŠ Trebišovská v Kutné Hoře Contract modification |
16,555,555 | 1,045,223 (+7%) |
|
„Realizace expozic ve Vlašském dvoře v rámci projektu ‚Revitalizace NKP Vlašský dvůr‘“ Contract modification |
10,307,582 | 112,180 (+2%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Revitalizace Sankturinovského domu v Kutné Hoře - Generální zhotovitel stavby- Dodatek SOD Č.6 Contract modification |
31,749,988 | 4,387,515 (+14%) |
|
Rekonstrukce MŠ Trebišovská v Kutné Hoře Contract modification |
16,555,555 | 1,045,223 (+7%) |
|
„Realizace expozic ve Vlašském dvoře v rámci projektu ‚Revitalizace NKP Vlašský dvůr‘“ Contract modification |
10,307,582 | 112,180 (+2%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 0% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.50 |
| Average decision length | 77.83 days |
| Contract | Modifications count | Cancelled | Without results | Decision length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sportovní hala Klimeška - 3. etapa | 1 | 62 | ||
| „Realizace expozic ve Vlašském dvoře v rámci projektu ‚Revitalizace NKP Vlašský dvůr‘“ | 1 | 73 | ||
| Realizace varovných protipovodňových opatření pro město Kutná Hora | 0 | 60 | ||
| Výběr dodavatele sdružených služeb dodávek silové elektřiny a dodavatele sdružených služeb dodávek zemního plynu na rok 2020 | 1 | 62 | ||
| Předcházení vzniku bioodpadu ve městě Kutná Hora | 0 | 105 | ||
| Navýšení separace odpadů ve městě Kutná Hora | 0 | 105 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 23) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 23) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 23) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 23) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 23) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 4% (1 from 23) |
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Kutná Hora, Masarykova ulice-rekonstrukce chodníků - Dodatek SOD č.5 | Contract modification by more than 50 % |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 87% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.65 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 23 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
