Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's
Dobrý den,
do kvality dat na profilu zadavatele jste nám nesprávně do chyb uvedli, že u vyjmenovaných veřejných zakázek chybí písemná zpráva zadavatele.
Tyto formuláře máme uveřejňovány na profilu zadavatele v souladu s vyhl. 168/2016 o uveřejňování formulářů pro účely zákona o zadávání veřejných zakázek a náležitostech profilu zadavatele. Výše uvedené (zveřejňování zpráv zadavatele) bylo také konzultováno ze stranou zajišťující profil zadavatel - podpora E-zak, a byla potvrzena správnost zveřejňování na profilu zadavatele. Prosíme o vysvětlení či nápravu z Vaší strany.
Děkuji
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
Sportovní hala Klimeška - 2. etapa
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
„Generální zhotovitel stavby – budova Vlašského dvora v rámci projektu ‚Revitalizace NKP Vlašský dvůr‘“
Construction work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
Sportovní hala Klimeška - 3. etapa
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
Snížení energetické náročnosti panelového domu Benešova 632-638, Kutná Hora
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
Oprava opěrné zdi kolem chrámu sv.Barbory v Kutné Hoře
Construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
PKS stavby a.s. |
1 | 64,498,979 |
UNISTAV CONSTRUCTION a.s. |
1 | 57,858,463 |
BFK service a.s. |
1 | 33,329,837 |
OMLUX, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 21,684,444 |
LANOSTAV OBNOVA PAMÁTEK s.r.o. |
2 | 19,482,278 |
Other suppliers | 104 | 170,341,369 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
PKS stavby a.s. |
1 | 64,498,979 |
UNISTAV CONSTRUCTION a.s. |
1 | 57,858,463 |
BFK service a.s. |
1 | 33,329,837 |
OMLUX, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 21,684,444 |
LANOSTAV OBNOVA PAMÁTEK s.r.o. |
2 | 19,482,278 |
DOPRAVNÍ STAVBY BOHEMIA s.r.o. |
2 | 14,852,728 |
Česká spořitelna, a.s. |
1 | 13,600,000 |
GREEN PROJECT s.r.o. |
2 | 12,819,216 |
H & B delta, s.r.o. |
1 | 10,866,404 |
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
2 | 10,039,755 |
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 9,209,305 |
Amper Market, a.s. |
1 | 8,189,816 |
" M plus " spol. s r.o. |
1 | 7,599,220 |
Dlažba Vysoké Mýto, s.r.o. |
1 | 7,462,588 |
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
1 | 5,421,251 |
DALFOS s.r.o. |
2 | 5,156,086 |
Green Gas DPB, a.s. |
1 | 2,868,140 |
AutoCont CZ a.s. |
1 | 2,825,325 |
MgA. MgA. Jan Miklica |
1 | 2,629,519 |
Ondřej Tunkl |
6 | 2,454,761 |
DESMO a.s. |
1 | 2,360,346 |
Rekonstrukce památek, s. r. o. |
1 | 1,967,074 |
Kutnohorská stavební, s.r.o. |
4 | 1,962,942 |
REINVEST spol. s r.o. |
2 | 1,953,000 |
Tomáš Krejčí |
4 | 1,854,131 |
Mydlochova stavební s.r.o. |
2 | 1,747,665 |
AQ audio studio s.r.o. |
1 | 1,738,362 |
České vysoké učení technické v Praze (ČVUT) |
1 | 1,680,000 |
KUDBI INTERIER s.r.o. |
1 | 1,590,875 |
Masák & Partner, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,580,000 |
Technické služby Kutná Hora, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 1,532,039 |
Skuhravý Jaroslav |
1 | 1,520,119 |
TREDO s.r.o. |
2 | 1,445,514 |
SIKA stavební činnost s.r.o. |
1 | 1,440,477 |
rbe Koláčný s.r.o. |
1 | 1,361,826 |
K+T stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 1,348,489 |
PAMAK s.r.o. |
2 | 1,317,029 |
Sport-Technik Bohemia s.r.o. |
1 | 1,309,898 |
Raamar, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,187,492 |
Městské lesy a rybníky Kutná Hora spol. s r.o. |
2 | 1,071,694 |
Památky Praha a.s. |
2 | 1,069,025 |
HaSaM, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,064,680 |
pokorny film s.r.o. |
1 | 970,000 |
INGPOS s.r.o. |
1 | 965,937 |
VÝTAHY VANĚRKA s.r.o. |
1 | 957,029 |
SPORT LX s.r.o. |
2 | 908,601 |
Jiří Secký |
1 | 867,310 |
PONTINAGAS s.r.o. |
1 | 867,216 |
Peter Nožina |
1 | 830,000 |
Ing. Martin Nepraš |
2 | 800,000 |
ZIP o.p.s. |
1 | 788,800 |
ATELIER SOUKUP OPL ŠVEHLA s.r.o. |
1 | 788,800 |
Zdeněk Němec |
1 | 739,867 |
MEGATOP s.r.o. |
1 | 711,329 |
LUNA PROGRESS s.r.o. |
1 | 683,900 |
AVE Kolín s.r.o. |
1 | 681,771 |
TISKÁRNA GRAFIA GRYČ, s.r.o. |
1 | 609,840 |
PROMAN s.r.o. |
1 | 494,800 |
InQool, a.s. |
1 | 485,000 |
XYZZY, s.r.o. |
1 | 470,640 |
STAVONEL, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 465,652 |
SPF Group, s.r.o. |
1 | 450,000 |
VV AUTO, s.r.o. |
2 | 434,710 |
Window Holding a.s. |
1 | 424,797 |
OKNOSTYL group s.r.o. |
1 | 410,000 |
Ing.arch. Eva Macholánová |
1 | 396,000 |
U N I K O M, a.s. |
1 | 384,215 |
M.C.TRITON, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 384,000 |
PRIMAKLIMA PARDUBICE s.r.o. |
1 | 363,170 |
T.S.R.ACT, s. r. o. |
1 | 352,500 |
Balder Invest s.r.o. |
1 | 336,912 |
KANTOR-BLAŽEK, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 336,460 |
Jiří Vintr |
1 | 334,931 |
Alena Rumpli |
2 | 309,600 |
Atelier M.A.A.T., s.r.o. |
1 | 282,000 |
AudioMaster CZ a.s. |
1 | 250,413 |
Louda Auto a.s. |
1 | 206,612 |
Milan Boháč |
1 | 198,269 |
PREPO - TEAM s.r.o. |
2 | 167,000 |
Ing. Jiří Kulič |
1 | 85,000 |
Miroslav Čonka |
1 | 51,500 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 9% (1 from 11) |
Nonprice competition | 16% (4 from 25) |
Division into lots | 16% (4 from 25) |
E-auction | 16% (4 from 25) |
Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 25) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
---|---|
Public procurement | 278,491,982 |
Small scale tenders | 61,007,458 |
Unregulated purchases | 1,023,878,673 |
Total | 1,363,378,113 |
Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
---|---|
Durable property purchases | 605,927,937 |
Material consumption | 21,362,520 |
Energy consumption | 102,577,432 |
Other consumption | 0 |
Sold goods | 3,112,060 |
Activation of durable property | 0 |
Activation of consumable property | 0 |
Change of stock | 77,208 |
Maintenance and repairs | 185,925,808 |
Travel costs | 1,846,407 |
Representation costs | 1,771,734 |
In-house services | 0 |
Other services | 401,545,191 |
Small long-term property costs | 17,600,286 |
Other costs | 21,631,528 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
„Generální zhotovitel stavby – budova Vlašského dvora v rámci projektu ‚Revitalizace NKP Vlašský dvůr‘“ Contract modification |
57,858,463 | 2,622,091 (+5%) |
Generální zhotovitel stavby - obnova parku v rámci projektu ‚Revitalizace NKP Vlašský dvůr‘ Contract modification |
12,819,216 | 558,307 (+5%) |
Podpora cyklodopravy v Kutné Hoře Contract modification |
7,127,826 | 122,900 (+2%) |
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
„Generální zhotovitel stavby – budova Vlašského dvora v rámci projektu ‚Revitalizace NKP Vlašský dvůr‘“ Contract modification |
57,858,463 | 2,622,091 (+5%) |
Generální zhotovitel stavby - obnova parku v rámci projektu ‚Revitalizace NKP Vlašský dvůr‘ Contract modification |
12,819,216 | 558,307 (+5%) |
Podpora cyklodopravy v Kutné Hoře Contract modification |
7,127,826 | 122,900 (+2%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Type of flaw | Result |
---|---|
Issued tenders without published result | 18% |
Cancelled contracts | 0% |
Average requirements modifications count | 0.73 |
Average decision length | 109.11 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 25) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 25) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 25) |
Missing call for tenders | 8% (2 from 25) |
Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 25) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 25) |
Contract | Type of flaw |
---|---|
Oprava opěrných zdí v parku pod Vlašským dvorem | Missing call for tenders |
Dodávka a montáž dřevěné podlahy do sportovní haly Klimeška | Missing call for tenders |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 96% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.91 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 23 tenders under the law) |
|