Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Karlovy Vary

IČO 00254657

Good buyer. Competitions are open to multiple bidders. Court found no legal misconduct.

2.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Letní a zimní údržba místních komunikací na území města Karlovy Vary v období 11/2014 – 10/2019
Opravy a údržba silnic a dalších zařízení a související služby
3
Ø3 in industry
Karlovy Vary – Hala pro míčové sporty
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
9
Ø4 in industry
Centrum zdraví a bezpečí, Karlovy Vary
Výstavba společenských, správních a kulturních center
8
Ø2 in industry
Karlovy Vary, Meandr Ohře - víceúčelová lávka, příjezdová komunikace a parkoviště
Výstavba pěších lávek
8
Ø6 in industry
Karlovy Vary - Venkovní bazén
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ave sběrné suroviny a.s.
1 149,400,504
Ohl Žs, a.s.
1 98,228,000
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
6 83,485,143
Colas Cz, a.s.
6 63,089,529
3xn spol. s r.o.
5 31,789,518
Other suppliers 29 157,000,716

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

74%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (6 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 21)
Division into lots 14% (3 from 21)
E-auction 0% (0 from 21)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 21)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 589,523,417
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 1,111,066,093
Total 1,700,589,511

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dodavatel v rámci projektu „Rozvoj služeb eGovernmentu v obcích“
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
- 384,400

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 6%
Cancelled contracts 23%
Average requirements modifications count 0.59

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 48)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 48)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 48)
Missing call for tenders 19% (9 from 48)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 48)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 48)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

57%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 76% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

93%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 48)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 48)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 48)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 48)
Supplier bankruptcy 6% (3 from 48)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (3 from 48)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (6 from 48)