Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Ústí nad Labem

IČO 00081531

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce budovy MmÚ - přepážkové centrum - zhotovitel stavby
Restoration work
0
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce budovy MmÚ - přepážkové centrum - zhotovitel stavby
Restoration work
0
Ø4 in industry
Čelakovského - smíšený dům
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Varovný informační systém obyvatelstva SO ORP Ústí nad Labem - ČÁST A (VISO)
Software package and information systems
2
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce bazénu v Jeslích města Ústí nad Labem - zhotovitel stavby
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
3 83,660,470
Veolia Komodity ČR, s.r.o.
1 69,348,500
Česká pošta, s.p.
1 41,000,000
SIM stavby spol. s r.o.
1 26,792,262
Colsys s.r.o.
1 25,648,094
Other suppliers 146 547,826,828

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

24%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 10)
Nonprice competition 14% (10 from 72)
Division into lots 7% (5 from 72)
E-auction 3% (2 from 72)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 72)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

45%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 560,947,645
Small scale tenders 125,869,256
Unregulated purchases 2,664,044,952
Total 3,350,861,852

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

60%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Poskytnutí služeb hybridní pošty formou uzavření veřejnoprávní smlouvy o přenesení výkonu působnosti v oblasti doručování
Technical exclusivity
- 41,000,000
Čelakovského - smíšený dům
Contract modification
26,792,262 5,261,378 (+20%)
Rekonstrukce komunikace Na Spálence (vč. Odvodnění PHK) - zhotovitel stavby
Not disclosed
- 3,803,831
Stavební úpravy MŠ U plavecké haly
Contract modification
11,399,499 3,541,673 (+32%)
Ústí nad Labem, Vaňov - Opěrná zeď - oprava kotev
Contract modification
8,855,066 1,400,232 (+16%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 56%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 77)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 77)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 77)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 77)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 77)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 77)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

48%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.39 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 77 tenders under the law)
0-250K 23 tenders
250K-500K 14 tenders
500K-1000K 26 tenders
1000K+ 31 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.