Buyer profile has high number of errors. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce budovy MmÚ - přepážkové centrum - zhotovitel stavby
Restoration work |
0
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce budovy MmÚ - přepážkové centrum - zhotovitel stavby
Restoration work |
0
Ø4 in industry |
|
Čelakovského - smíšený dům
Construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
Varovný informační systém obyvatelstva SO ORP Ústí nad Labem - ČÁST A (VISO)
Software package and information systems |
2
Ø2 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce bazénu v Jeslích města Ústí nad Labem - zhotovitel stavby
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
3 | 83,660,470 |
|
Veolia Komodity ČR, s.r.o. |
1 | 69,348,500 |
|
Česká pošta, s.p. |
1 | 41,000,000 |
|
SIM stavby spol. s r.o. |
1 | 26,792,262 |
|
Colsys s.r.o. |
1 | 25,648,094 |
| Other suppliers | 146 | 547,826,828 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
3 | 83,660,470 |
|
Veolia Komodity ČR, s.r.o. |
1 | 69,348,500 |
|
Česká pošta, s.p. |
1 | 41,000,000 |
|
SIM stavby spol. s r.o. |
1 | 26,792,262 |
|
Colsys s.r.o. |
1 | 25,648,094 |
|
Pražská energetika, a.s. |
1 | 23,009,200 |
|
INSKY spol. s r.o. |
5 | 17,616,848 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
7 | 17,435,028 |
|
Horák - stavební a obchodní společnost, s.r.o. |
2 | 17,335,167 |
|
METALL QUATRO spol. s r.o. |
1 | 14,997,222 |
|
Metrostav Infrastructure a.s. |
2 | 14,729,535 |
|
RAVEK s.r.o. |
3 | 12,883,618 |
|
Studio Jelínek s. r. o. |
1 | 11,399,499 |
|
Martin Bukovský |
1 | 10,626,511 |
|
Repis s.r.o. |
2 | 10,569,902 |
|
ONERO s.r.o. |
4 | 9,673,000 |
|
STRABAG Rail a.s. |
1 | 8,855,066 |
|
DigiTry Art Technologies s.r.o. |
1 | 7,058,000 |
|
HYDROSOFT Veleslavín s.r.o. |
1 | 6,551,524 |
|
Vodohospodářský rozvoj a výstavba a.s. |
1 | 6,551,524 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
1 | 6,392,068 |
|
Miroslav Kudrna |
2 | 5,800,000 |
|
TELKONT s.r.o. |
5 | 5,584,114 |
|
CF sociální firma, s.r.o. |
3 | 5,505,535 |
|
Bajger s.r.o. |
4 | 5,287,234 |
|
JAROSLAV PEM |
1 | 4,937,000 |
|
HIT Stavby s.r.o. |
2 | 4,611,578 |
|
ALGON, a.s. |
1 | 4,590,226 |
|
APIDA s.r.o. |
1 | 3,939,000 |
|
Martin Kopp |
2 | 3,893,120 |
|
DOKOM FINAL s.r.o. |
5 | 3,549,127 |
|
AVE Ústí nad Labem s.r.o. |
2 | 3,526,800 |
|
Dušan Usvald |
1 | 3,500,000 |
|
TECHTEX s.r.o. |
1 | 3,175,090 |
|
Petr Pacanda |
1 | 3,161,550 |
|
PB SCOM s.r.o. |
1 | 2,994,678 |
|
AFRY CZ s.r.o. |
2 | 2,896,000 |
|
PETROM STAVBY, a.s. |
1 | 2,892,896 |
|
JV STAVBY, spol. s r.o. |
5 | 2,867,699 |
|
Sdružení veterinárních lékařů a služeb s. r. o. |
1 | 2,800,000 |
|
ZEMPRA DC s.r.o. |
1 | 2,336,401 |
|
Patrik Hart |
5 | 2,228,919 |
|
Ing. Jiří Huptych |
2 | 2,218,176 |
|
ROYAL TECH s.r.o. |
1 | 1,997,934 |
|
Window Holding a.s. |
1 | 1,933,645 |
|
HAGL, spol. s.r.o. |
2 | 1,878,200 |
|
Severočeská stavební, a.s. |
1 | 1,837,853 |
|
Jiří Pavelka |
2 | 1,798,026 |
|
TOPSERVIS Novák s.r.o. |
2 | 1,696,414 |
|
Gabriel s.r.o. |
1 | 1,505,600 |
|
MIRÓ Audit Services s.r.o. |
1 | 1,495,000 |
|
OK GARDEN s.r.o. |
1 | 1,444,000 |
|
ARTENDR s.r.o. |
1 | 1,200,000 |
|
Blachere-Illumination CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 1,194,632 |
|
DECOLED s.r.o. |
2 | 1,151,150 |
|
OKIM spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,147,883 |
|
Václav Kučera |
1 | 1,123,100 |
|
Petr Malenčuk |
1 | 1,036,720 |
|
Šetři světlem s.r.o. |
1 | 1,003,484 |
|
BÜROPROFI s.r.o. |
1 | 988,850 |
|
Digitronic CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 980,000 |
|
SUEZ CZ a.s. |
2 | 974,000 |
|
SMAŽÍK NORD s.r.o. |
2 | 847,200 |
|
Matěj Kroutil,DiS. |
1 | 739,556 |
|
V H L, s.r.o. |
1 | 724,000 |
|
Skanska a.s. |
1 | 671,500 |
|
AFC Servis DC a.s. |
2 | 646,479 |
|
MATRIX a.s. |
1 | 630,595 |
|
BAUMATERM stavební s.r.o. |
2 | 599,635 |
|
Jan Rytíř |
2 | 596,423 |
|
Růžolící chrochtík, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 590,130 |
|
Izolace Ústí s.r.o. |
1 | 589,000 |
|
ENGEL s.r.o. |
1 | 579,150 |
|
EUROGREEN CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 558,601 |
|
VYSSPA Sports Technology s.r.o. |
1 | 529,511 |
|
KOVO, výrobní družstvo |
1 | 518,000 |
|
JATOMA s.r.o. |
1 | 483,134 |
|
JRK Česká republika s.r.o. |
2 | 482,000 |
|
BOXED, s.r.o. |
1 | 462,402 |
|
SCANLOCK CZ, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 439,528 |
|
Gerhard Horejsek a spol., s.r.o. |
1 | 354,705 |
|
PRO CEDOP s.r.o. |
1 | 340,000 |
|
Jiří Ventura |
2 | 290,202 |
|
Tomáš Višňák |
1 | 285,000 |
|
Quality Group s.r.o. |
1 | 267,000 |
|
AA OKNA DVEŘE s.r.o. |
1 | 246,965 |
|
Stavby Žofka s.r.o. |
1 | 200,559 |
|
Moudrý překlad, s.r.o. |
1 | 200,000 |
|
TopGis, s.r.o. |
1 | 190,000 |
|
REKLAMA CENTRUM, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 178,399 |
|
Zemní a dopravní stavby Hrdý Milan , s.r.o. |
1 | 160,419 |
|
Tomáš Kratina |
1 | 145,000 |
|
Velkoobchod ŠAS,s.r.o. |
1 | 127,243 |
|
Envipor, s.r.o. |
2 | 117,500 |
|
URBITECH s.r.o. |
1 | 78,720 |
|
ing. Martina Součková |
1 | 67,000 |
|
LOSAN s.r.o. |
2 | 60,250 |
|
SAFE TREES, s.r.o. |
1 | 48,400 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 10) |
| Nonprice competition | 14% (10 from 72) |
| Division into lots | 7% (5 from 72) |
| E-auction and DPS | 3% (2 from 72) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 72) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 560,947,645 |
| Small scale tenders | 125,869,256 |
| Unregulated purchases | 2,664,044,952 |
| Total | 3,350,861,852 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 686,990,225 |
| Material consumption | 90,243,618 |
| Energy consumption | 102,484,832 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 1,330,178 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 791,881,476 |
| Travel costs | 4,281,230 |
| Representation costs | 6,133,593 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 1,553,213,916 |
| Small long-term property costs | 32,910,281 |
| Other costs | 81,392,503 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Poskytnutí služeb hybridní pošty formou uzavření veřejnoprávní smlouvy o přenesení výkonu působnosti v oblasti doručování Technical exclusivity |
- | 41,000,000 |
|
Čelakovského - smíšený dům Contract modification |
26,792,262 | 5,261,378 (+20%) |
|
Rekonstrukce komunikace Na Spálence (vč. Odvodnění PHK) - zhotovitel stavby Not disclosed |
- | 3,803,831 |
|
Stavební úpravy MŠ U plavecké haly Contract modification |
11,399,499 | 3,541,673 (+32%) |
|
Ústí nad Labem, Vaňov - Opěrná zeď - oprava kotev Contract modification |
8,855,066 | 1,400,232 (+16%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 30% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.30 |
| Average decision length | 62.30 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 77) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 77) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 77) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 77) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 77) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 77) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 75% (zakázek z 77 ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.39 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 77 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
