Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Olomouc

IČO 00299308

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Provozování plaveckého stadionu Olomouc
Recreational, cultural and sporting services
0
Ø1 in industry
Tramvajová trať II. etapa - Nové Sady - Povel II
Construction work for highways, roads
6
Ø5 in industry
Tramvajová trať 8. května
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
5
Ø2 in industry
Radnice Olomouc - oprava fasády a věže
Building completion work
3
Ø4 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření II. B etapa - související investice
Construction work for highways, roads
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
IDS - Inženýrské a dopravní stavby Olomouc a.s.
7 340,313,328
OHL ŽS, a.s.
1 193,483,370
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
3 132,453,250
HC Olomouc s.r.o.
1 54,000,000
H & B delta, s.r.o.
3 52,347,646
Other suppliers 293 1,420,951,145

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

46%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 35% (8 from 23)
Nonprice competition 10% (7 from 70)
Division into lots 9% (6 from 70)
E-auction 4% (3 from 70)
Innovative procedure 1% (1 from 70)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

52%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,491,831,393
Small scale tenders 491,395,425
Unregulated purchases 5,322,986,552
Total 7,306,213,370

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

56%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Propagační a reklamní služby
Authorship rights
- 54,000,000
Radnice Olomouc - oprava fasády a věže
Contract modification
47,289,620 18,496,958 (+40%)
Českobratrská – rekonstrukce vodovodu a kanalizace
Outside directive scope
- 12,761,298
ZŠ Gorkého - polytechnické učebny - stavební práce - zadání JŘBÚ
Previous tender without bids
- 12,537,002
Tramvajová trať II. etapa - Nové Sady - Povel II
Contract modification
386,966,740 9,848,195 (+3%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 56%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 9%
Cancelled contracts 23%
Average requirements modifications count 1.59
Average decision length 63.26 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 82)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 82)
Missing buyer ID 2% (2 from 82)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 82)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 82)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 82)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 87% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.06 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 79 tenders under the law)
0-250K 49 tenders
250K-500K 43 tenders
500K-1000K 57 tenders
1000K+ 73 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.