Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Olomouc

IČO 00299308

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

Show average values  
54%
Bidder participation
83%
Winner concentration
46%
Pro-competitive tools
52%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
56%
Competitive contracting
61%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
66%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Provozování plaveckého stadionu Olomouc
Recreational, cultural and sporting services
0
Ø1 in industry
Tramvajová trať II. etapa - Nové Sady - Povel II
Construction work for highways, roads
6
Ø5 in industry
Tramvajová trať 8. května
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
5
Ø2 in industry
Radnice Olomouc - oprava fasády a věže
Building completion work
3
Ø4 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření II. B etapa - související investice
Construction work for highways, roads
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
IDS - Inženýrské a dopravní stavby Olomouc a.s.
 7 340,313,328
OHL ŽS, a.s.
 1 193,483,370
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
 3 132,453,250
HC Olomouc s.r.o.
 1 54,000,000
H & B delta, s.r.o.
 3 52,347,646
Other suppliers 293 1,420,951,145

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

46%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 35% (8 from 23)
Nonprice competition 10% (7 from 70)
Division into lots 9% (6 from 70)
E-auction 4% (3 from 70)
Innovative procedure 1% (1 from 70)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

52%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,491,831,393
Small scale tenders 491,395,425
Unregulated purchases 5,322,986,552
Total 7,306,213,370

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

56%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Propagační a reklamní služby
Authorship rights 		- 54,000,000
Radnice Olomouc - oprava fasády a věže
Contract modification 		47,289,620 18,496,958 (+40%)
Českobratrská – rekonstrukce vodovodu a kanalizace
Outside directive scope 		- 12,761,298
ZŠ Gorkého - polytechnické učebny - stavební práce - zadání JŘBÚ
Previous tender without bids 		- 12,537,002
Tramvajová trať II. etapa - Nové Sady - Povel II
Contract modification 		386,966,740 9,848,195 (+3%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 56%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 9%
Cancelled contracts 23%
Average requirements modifications count 1.59
Average decision length 63.26 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 82)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 82)
Missing buyer ID 2% (2 from 82)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 82)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 82)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 82)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 87% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.06 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 79 tenders under the law)
0-250K 49 tenders
250K-500K 43 tenders
500K-1000K 57 tenders
1000K+ 73 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.