Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Klášterec nad Ohří

IČO 00261939

The competition for contracts is low. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

17%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

72%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Autobusy Karlovy Vary, a.s.
1 45,581,872
STAVMAX Group s.r.o.
6 36,787,857
Silnice Topolany a.s.
4 36,562,975
PETROM STAVBY, a.s.
5 27,646,764
HERKUL a.s.
1 5,825,413
Other suppliers 45 143,088,431

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

32%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 6% (1 from 16)
Division into lots 6% (1 from 16)
E-auction 0% (0 from 16)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 16)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 363,606,315
Small scale tenders 64,554,443
Unregulated purchases 538,893,973
Total 967,054,731

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

86%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
„DOPRAVNÍ TERMINÁL, KLÁŠTEREC NAD OHŘÍ, UL. NÁDRAŽNÍ“
Contract modification
14,799,968 2,805,053 (+19%)
Cyklostezka podél Kláštereckého potoka, Klášterec nad Ohří
Contract modification
12,461,372 1,102,582 (+9%)
Rekonstrukce povrchů ulice Sadová v Klášterci nad Ohří - II. vyhlášení
Contract modification
8,450,457 1,040,741 (+13%)
Vybudování učebny pro výuku přírodních věd na ZŠ Krátká (opakované řízení)
Contract modification
378,131 112,815 (+30%)
Vybudování multimediální jazykové učebny na ZŠ Školní, Klášterec nad Ohří
Contract modification
2,416,831 34,545 (+2%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

42%
average 60%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

74%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 93% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.64 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 4 tenders
250K-500K 14 tenders
500K-1000K 10 tenders
1000K+ 12 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.