The competition for contracts is low. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Zajištění dopravní obslužnosti obce provozováním veřejné linkové dopravy (městské hromadné dopravy) v Klášterci nad Ohří
Public road transport services |
2
Ø3 in industry |
|
Technická a dopravní infrastruktura pro výstavbu rodinných domů v lokalitě Ciboušovská v Klášterci nad Ohří - III. vyhlášení
Construction work for highways, roads |
4
Ø5 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce budovy v ulici Nádražní 169 v Klášterci nad Ohří
Construction work for houses |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
„DOPRAVNÍ TERMINÁL, KLÁŠTEREC NAD OHŘÍ, UL. NÁDRAŽNÍ“
Construction work for highways, roads |
4
Ø5 in industry |
|
Cyklostezka podél Kláštereckého potoka, Klášterec nad Ohří
Construction work for highways, roads |
1
Ø5 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
Autobusy Karlovy Vary, a.s. |
1 | 45,581,872 |
|
STAVMAX Group s.r.o. |
6 | 36,787,857 |
|
Silnice Topolany a.s. |
4 | 36,562,975 |
|
PETROM STAVBY, a.s. |
5 | 27,646,764 |
|
HERKUL a.s. |
1 | 5,825,413 |
| Other suppliers | 45 | 143,088,431 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Autobusy Karlovy Vary, a.s. |
1 | 45,581,872 |
|
STAVMAX Group s.r.o. |
6 | 36,787,857 |
|
Silnice Topolany a.s. |
4 | 36,562,975 |
|
PETROM STAVBY, a.s. |
5 | 27,646,764 |
|
HERKUL a.s. |
1 | 5,825,413 |
|
AV MEDIA, a.s. |
2 | 3,692,876 |
|
Stavební společnost Jaroslav Oršuliak, a.s. |
1 | 3,172,228 |
|
Metrostav Infrastructure a.s. |
1 | 2,908,357 |
|
VYSSPA Sports Technology s.r.o. |
1 | 2,723,953 |
|
MESSOR s. r. o. |
7 | 2,331,875 |
|
Adam Vavroušek |
1 | 1,881,795 |
|
STAMO, spol. s.r.o. |
2 | 1,426,560 |
|
MK MONT - Illuminations |
1 | 1,377,189 |
|
Petr Vachulka |
2 | 1,328,131 |
|
HELAGO-CZ, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,082,000 |
|
FLORA SERVIS s.r.o. |
1 | 1,056,426 |
|
Jan Hošek |
2 | 861,500 |
|
ZÁVODNÝ ELEKTRO s.r.o. |
1 | 853,350 |
|
MIDAKON s.r.o. |
1 | 705,000 |
|
SVS 2000 spol. s r.o. |
1 | 645,028 |
|
JM Demicarr s.r.o. |
1 | 625,562 |
|
Union servis Praha s.r.o. |
1 | 606,962 |
|
BOULIT s.r.o. |
2 | 598,872 |
|
Hřiště hrou s.r.o. |
1 | 485,688 |
|
JKPO CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 440,000 |
|
SANTAL spol. s r. o. |
1 | 426,833 |
|
Jan Ulman |
1 | 337,530 |
|
NE2D Projekt s.r.o. |
1 | 320,000 |
|
ADVISIA s.r.o. |
1 | 252,000 |
|
Mystic constructions spol. s r.o. |
1 | 237,000 |
|
JAMPL-PSV s.r.o. |
1 | 201,670 |
|
BPO spol. s r.o. |
1 | 190,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 25% (1 from 4) |
| Nonprice competition | 6% (1 from 16) |
| Division into lots | 6% (1 from 16) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 16) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 16) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 363,606,315 |
| Small scale tenders | 64,554,443 |
| Unregulated purchases | 538,893,973 |
| Total | 967,054,731 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 576,395,844 |
| Material consumption | 16,942,650 |
| Energy consumption | 16,875,449 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 1,191,724 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 125,788,528 |
| Travel costs | 774,320 |
| Representation costs | 1,026,325 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 209,924,785 |
| Small long-term property costs | 10,236,541 |
| Other costs | 7,898,566 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
„DOPRAVNÍ TERMINÁL, KLÁŠTEREC NAD OHŘÍ, UL. NÁDRAŽNÍ“ Contract modification |
14,799,968 | 2,805,053 (+19%) |
|
Cyklostezka podél Kláštereckého potoka, Klášterec nad Ohří Contract modification |
12,461,372 | 1,102,582 (+9%) |
|
Rekonstrukce povrchů ulice Sadová v Klášterci nad Ohří - II. vyhlášení Contract modification |
8,450,457 | 1,040,741 (+13%) |
|
Vybudování učebny pro výuku přírodních věd na ZŠ Krátká (opakované řízení) Contract modification |
378,131 | 112,815 (+30%) |
|
Vybudování multimediální jazykové učebny na ZŠ Školní, Klášterec nad Ohří Contract modification |
2,416,831 | 34,545 (+2%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
„DOPRAVNÍ TERMINÁL, KLÁŠTEREC NAD OHŘÍ, UL. NÁDRAŽNÍ“ Contract modification |
14,799,968 | 2,805,053 (+19%) |
|
Cyklostezka podél Kláštereckého potoka, Klášterec nad Ohří Contract modification |
12,461,372 | 1,102,582 (+9%) |
|
Rekonstrukce povrchů ulice Sadová v Klášterci nad Ohří - II. vyhlášení Contract modification |
8,450,457 | 1,040,741 (+13%) |
|
Vybudování učebny pro výuku přírodních věd na ZŠ Krátká (opakované řízení) Contract modification |
378,131 | 112,815 (+30%) |
|
Vybudování multimediální jazykové učebny na ZŠ Školní, Klášterec nad Ohří Contract modification |
2,416,831 | 34,545 (+2%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 33% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 1.33 |
| Average decision length | 80.20 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 16) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 16) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 16) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 16) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 16) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 16) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 93% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.64 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
