Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile has high number of errors.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Sběrný dvůr Točna Příbor
Construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
Energetické úspory Základní školy Jičínská v příboře
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
Stavební úpravy radnice v Příboře
Construction work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Stavební úpravy komunikací a zpevněných ploch na ulici Vrchlického
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
Telekomunikační mobilní služby pro město Kopřivnice a jiné veřejné zadavatele
Telecommunications services |
2
Ø2 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
NOSTA, s.r.o. |
1 | 25,255,000 |
|
JAVORNÍK-CZ-PLUS s.r.o. |
1 | 21,842,227 |
|
Správa majetku města Příbor s.r.o. |
2 | 21,424,107 |
|
FICHNA - HUDECZEK a.s. |
1 | 17,356,584 |
|
SEMITA - DS s.r.o. |
2 | 12,278,710 |
| Other suppliers | 22 | 133,659,994 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
NOSTA, s.r.o. |
1 | 25,255,000 |
|
JAVORNÍK-CZ-PLUS s.r.o. |
1 | 21,842,227 |
|
Správa majetku města Příbor s.r.o. |
2 | 21,424,107 |
|
FICHNA - HUDECZEK a.s. |
1 | 17,356,584 |
|
SEMITA - DS s.r.o. |
2 | 12,278,710 |
|
T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s. |
1 | 8,560,628 |
|
ŠMÍD STAVEBNÍ s.r.o. |
2 | 6,298,526 |
|
Pavlacký s.r.o. |
1 | 5,262,454 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
1 | 4,510,779 |
|
DEV COMPANY, spol. s r. o. |
1 | 4,288,527 |
|
Česká pojišťovna a.s. |
2 | 4,163,405 |
|
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
2 | 4,130,244 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
2 | 3,879,000 |
|
EUROVIA CS, a.s. |
1 | 3,849,762 |
|
JRK Česká republika s.r.o. |
1 | 3,486,000 |
|
Stav RK servis s.r.o. |
2 | 2,168,620 |
|
NH stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 2,149,591 |
|
EUTEL SERVIS s.r.o. |
1 | 2,126,830 |
|
LDF Rožnov a.s. |
1 | 1,483,700 |
|
ARPEX MORAVA s.r.o. |
1 | 739,501 |
|
RI OKNA a.s. |
1 | 728,918 |
|
STAV MORAVIA spol. s r. o. |
1 | 597,565 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 1) |
| Nonprice competition | 0% (0 from 10) |
| Division into lots | 10% (1 from 10) |
| E-auction and DPS | 0% (0 from 10) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 10) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 251,666,244 |
| Small scale tenders | 44,448,915 |
| Unregulated purchases | 240,182,912 |
| Total | 536,298,071 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 323,823,600 |
| Material consumption | 11,304,172 |
| Energy consumption | 18,742,257 |
| Other consumption | 2,918,453 |
| Sold goods | 537,165 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 75,816,553 |
| Travel costs | 325,606 |
| Representation costs | 316,765 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 83,112,741 |
| Small long-term property costs | 13,685,346 |
| Other costs | 5,715,413 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Stavební úpravy radnice v Příboře Contract modification |
17,356,584 | 4,886,464 (+29%) |
|
Sběrný dvůr Točna Příbor Contract modification |
25,255,000 | 2,901,674 (+12%) |
|
DODÁVKA TEPLA DO OBJEKTŮ Č.P. 238, 233 A 231 V PŘÍBOŘE Technical exclusivity |
- | 2,343,616 |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Stavební úpravy radnice v Příboře Contract modification |
17,356,584 | 4,886,464 (+29%) |
|
Sběrný dvůr Točna Příbor Contract modification |
25,255,000 | 2,901,674 (+12%) |
|
DODÁVKA TEPLA DO OBJEKTŮ Č.P. 238, 233 A 231 V PŘÍBOŘE Technical exclusivity |
- | 2,343,616 |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 15) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 60% (zakázek z 15 ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.73 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law) |
|
| Contract | Type of discrepancy |
|---|---|
| Dodávka elektřiny v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky elektřiny na rok 2020 | Tender not found on any profile |
| Sběrný dvůr Točna Příbor | Price inconsistent with Journal |
| Dodávka elektřiny v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky elektřiny na rok 2022 | Tender not found on any profile |
| Dodávka zemního plynu v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky zemního plynu na rok 2022 | Tender not found on any profile |
| Stavební úpravy radnice v Příboře | Tender not found on any profile |
| Telekomunikační mobilní služby pro město Kopřivnice a jiné veřejné zadavatele | Payment information missing |
| Stavební úpravy komunikací a zpevněných ploch na ulici Vrchlického | Tender not found on any profile |
| DODÁVKA TEPLA DO OBJEKTŮ Č.P. 238, 233 A 231 V PŘÍBOŘE | Payment information missing |
| Dodávka tepelné energie | Price inconsistent with Journal |
| Dodávka tepelné energie | Payment information missing |
| Kompletní pojištění pro město Příbor, část 1: Pojištění majetku a odpovědnosti za újmu | Tender not found on any profile |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
