Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Příbor

IČO 00298328

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

56%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Sběrný dvůr Točna Příbor
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Energetické úspory Základní školy Jičínská v příboře
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy radnice v Příboře
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy komunikací a zpevněných ploch na ulici Vrchlického
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Telekomunikační mobilní služby pro město Kopřivnice a jiné veřejné zadavatele
Telecommunications services
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

97%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
NOSTA, s.r.o.
1 25,255,000
JAVORNÍK-CZ-PLUS s.r.o.
1 21,842,227
Správa majetku města Příbor s.r.o.
2 21,424,107
FICHNA - HUDECZEK a.s.
1 17,356,584
SEMITA - DS s.r.o.
2 12,278,710
Other suppliers 22 133,659,994

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

10%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

74%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 251,666,244
Small scale tenders 44,448,915
Unregulated purchases 240,182,912
Total 536,298,071

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

68%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Stavební úpravy radnice v Příboře
Contract modification
17,356,584 4,886,464 (+29%)
Sběrný dvůr Točna Příbor
Contract modification
25,255,000 2,901,674 (+12%)
DODÁVKA TEPLA DO OBJEKTŮ Č.P. 238, 233 A 231 V PŘÍBOŘE
Technical exclusivity
- 2,343,616

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

31%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 60% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.73 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 4 tenders
1000K+ 8 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.