Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
REKONSTRUKCE A MODERNIZACE SPORTOVNÍHO AREÁLU, MĚSTSKÝ STADION V KARVINÉ - RAJI - SO.03, SO.04, SO.10
Stavební práce |
12
Ø5 in industry |
|
REKONSTRUKCE A MODERNIZACE SPORTOVNÍHO AREÁLU, MĚSTSKÝ STADION V KARVINÉ – RÁJI – SO.11, SO.53
Stavební práce |
12
Ø5 in industry |
|
OBNOVA OBJEKTU A OKOLÍ KINA CENTRUM KARVINÁ
Konstrukční a stavební práce |
8
Ø3 in industry |
|
STAVEBNÍ ÚPRAVY BÝVALÉHO OBJEKTU KB
Rekonstrukce budov |
8
Ø5 in industry |
|
REVITALIZACE VEŘEJNÝCH PLOCH V KARVINÉ - NOVÉM MĚSTĚ
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy |
8
Ø5 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
Awt Rekultivace a.s. |
2 | 122,892,712 |
|
Ridera Stavební a.s. |
1 | 75,748,150 |
|
Zlínstav a.s. |
1 | 59,760,041 |
|
Jankostav s.r.o. |
3 | 39,268,222 |
|
Vokd, a.s. |
1 | 35,998,689 |
| Other suppliers | 29 | 157,561,472 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Awt Rekultivace a.s. |
2 | 122,892,712 |
|
Ridera Stavební a.s. |
1 | 75,748,150 |
|
Zlínstav a.s. |
1 | 59,760,041 |
|
Jankostav s.r.o. |
3 | 39,268,222 |
|
Vokd, a.s. |
1 | 35,998,689 |
|
Sska-stavební společnost Karviná, a.s. |
5 | 32,809,427 |
|
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o. |
3 | 25,973,002 |
|
Eurovia Cs, a.s. |
2 | 18,350,597 |
|
Beskydská stavební, a.s. |
1 | 17,379,764 |
|
Centropol Energy, a.s. |
2 | 14,666,740 |
|
Bystroň Group a.s. |
1 | 7,902,807 |
|
Česká podnikatelská pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 7,196,523 |
|
Ing. Roman Mamica |
1 | 6,129,125 |
|
Charita Opava |
2 | 4,359,600 |
|
Flagro a.s. |
1 | 3,790,000 |
|
Severomoravské vodovody a kanalizace Ostrava a.s. |
1 | 3,183,030 |
|
Strabag a.s. |
1 | 3,150,000 |
|
Kasch - interiér s.r.o. |
1 | 2,487,819 |
|
Kuman spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,399,982 |
|
Educa24 agency, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,232,629 |
|
Veolia Energie Čr, a.s. |
1 | 1,932,733 |
|
Talpa - Rpf, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,536,267 |
|
Flora Servis s.r.o. |
1 | 1,453,627 |
|
Ki-wi Digital s.r.o. |
1 | 413,900 |
|
Kaiser servis,spol. s r.o. |
1 | 213,900 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (9 from 0) |
| Nonprice competition | 6% (1 from 17) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 17) |
| E-auction and DPS | 0% (0 from 17) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% ( from 17) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 491,529,290 |
| Small scale tenders | 0 |
| Unregulated purchases | 756,322,999 |
| Total | 1,247,852,289 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
REALIZACE DODÁVKY VODY A ODVÁDĚNÍ ODPADNÍCH VOD Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody) |
- | 3,183,030 |
|
Nové služby Technologického centra Karviná - elektronická úřední deska Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek |
- | 413,900 |
|
REKONSTRUKCE A MODERNIZACE SPORTOVNÍHO AREÁLU, MĚSTSKÝ STADION V KARVINÉ – RÁJI – správce stavby dodatek č. 2 Dodatečné práce |
- | Not disclosed |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
REALIZACE DODÁVKY VODY A ODVÁDĚNÍ ODPADNÍCH VOD Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody) |
- | 3,183,030 |
|
Nové služby Technologického centra Karviná - elektronická úřední deska Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek |
- | 413,900 |
|
REKONSTRUKCE A MODERNIZACE SPORTOVNÍHO AREÁLU, MĚSTSKÝ STADION V KARVINÉ – RÁJI – správce stavby dodatek č. 2 Dodatečné práce |
- | Not disclosed |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 15% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 1.15 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 38) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 38) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 38) |
| Missing call for tenders | 21% (8 from 38) |
| Missing winning price | 0% ( from 38) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% ( from 38) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 80% (zakázek z ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.88 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law) |
|
Do the risky firms win frequently? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award | 0% (0 from 38) |
| Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement | 0% (0 from 38) |
| Subcontractor share above 50 % | 8% (3 from 38) |
| Supplier demise shortly after contract | 0% (0 from 38) |
| Supplier bankruptcy | 3% (1 from 38) |
| Supplier donating to political party | 24% (9 from 38) |
| Supplier did not publish financial results on time | 13% (5 from 38) |
