Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Karviná

IČO 00297534

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

18.
ranking
72%
zIndex
Show average values  
44%
Bidder participation
95%
Winner concentration
35%
Pro-competitive tools
71%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
51%
Competitive contracting
55%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
89%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

44%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Příkazní smlouva č. MMK/SML/1258/2019 o zajišťování komunálních služeb pro statutární město Karviná a jeho obyvatele
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
„REKONSTRUKCE DOMŮ ČP. 33-35 V KARVINÉ“
Construction work
9
Ø4 in industry
„SPORTOVNÍ AREÁL UL. LEONOVOVA, KARVINÁ-HRANICE“
Construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
KOMPLEXNÍ POJIŠTĚNÍ MAJETKU A ODPOVĚDNOSTI ZA ÚJMU - 1. část
Property insurance services
3
Ø2 in industry
„Stavební úpravy ul. Březová v Karviné - Ráji“
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

95%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Technické služby Karviná, a.s.
 5 104,145,916
Metrostav a.s.
 1 78,598,129
JANKOSTAV s.r.o.
 17 63,815,151
OHL ŽS, a.s.
 1 51,234,126
KUMAN spol. s r.o.
 15 37,625,263
Other suppliers 281 774,453,183

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

35%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 20)
Nonprice competition 15% (5 from 34)
Division into lots 26% (9 from 34)
E-auction 0% (0 from 34)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 34)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

71%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 566,949,814
Small scale tenders 595,980,065
Unregulated purchases 1,118,649,173
Total 2,281,579,052

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

51%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dodávka tepla a ohřev teplé vody Žižkova 2379/54a, Karviná Mizerov
Technical exclusivity 		- 29,273,040
„REKONSTRUKCE DOMŮ ČP. 33-35 V KARVINÉ“
Contract modification 		78,598,129 14,503,702 (+19%)
„SPORTOVNÍ AREÁL UL. LEONOVOVA, KARVINÁ-HRANICE“
Contract modification 		51,234,126 9,500,371 (+19%)
„Stavební úpravy ul. Březová v Karviné - Ráji“
Contract modification 		17,600,000 1,594,143 (+10%)
ZATEPLENÍ BYTOVÉHO DOMU ČP. 871, U LESA, KARVINÁ, RÁJ
Contract modification 		12,288,881 330,986 (+3%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

55%
average 56%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 21%
Average requirements modifications count 1.47
Average decision length 65.00 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 36)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 36)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 36)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 36)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 36)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 36)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

89%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.19 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 36 tenders under the law)
0-250K 50 tenders
250K-500K 24 tenders
500K-1000K 57 tenders
1000K+ 113 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.