Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Jilemnice

IČO 00275808

The competition for contracts is low. Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

Show average values  
26%
Bidder participation
96%
Winner concentration
20%
Pro-competitive tools
53%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
80%
Competitive contracting
60%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
40%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

26%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Silnice II/286 revitalizace ul. Žižkova, Jilemnice
Road-repair works
4
Ø5 in industry
Oprava objektu MŠ Zámecká, Jilemnice, I.“
Construction work
0
Ø4 in industry
Údržba místních komunikací ve městě Jilemnice v zimním období 2019–2023
Cleaning and sanitation services in urban or rural areas, and related services
1
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce a stavební úpravy ZŠ Jana Harracha v Jilemnici
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
ÚPRAVA VEŘEJNÉ ZELENĚ V JILEMNICI, OBDOBÍ 2022-2025
Planting and maintenance services of green areas
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
M-SILNICE a.s.
 1 47,677,702
Daniel Flamberg
 2 13,300,000
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
 1 11,578,700
Agropark servis s.r.o.
 1 7,762,247
AV MEDIA, a.s.
 1 4,693,217
Other suppliers 14 38,928,725

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 8)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 8)
E-auction 0% (0 from 8)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 8)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 119,432,699
Small scale tenders 22,725,304
Unregulated purchases 360,575,640
Total 502,733,643

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

80%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Silnice II/286 revitalizace ul. Žižkova, Jilemnice
Contract modification 		47,677,702 4,451,553 (+10%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

40%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.78 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 3 tenders
1000K+ 7 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.