Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Jilemnice

IČO 00275808

The competition for contracts is low. Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

26%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Silnice II/286 revitalizace ul. Žižkova, Jilemnice
Road-repair works
4
Ø5 in industry
Oprava objektu MŠ Zámecká, Jilemnice, I.“
Construction work
0
Ø4 in industry
Údržba místních komunikací ve městě Jilemnice v zimním období 2019–2023
Cleaning and sanitation services in urban or rural areas, and related services
1
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce a stavební úpravy ZŠ Jana Harracha v Jilemnici
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
ÚPRAVA VEŘEJNÉ ZELENĚ V JILEMNICI, OBDOBÍ 2022-2025
Planting and maintenance services of green areas
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
M-SILNICE a.s.
1 47,677,702
Daniel Flamberg
2 13,300,000
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
1 11,578,700
Agropark servis s.r.o.
1 7,762,247
AV MEDIA, a.s.
1 4,693,217
Other suppliers 14 38,928,725

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 8)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 8)
E-auction 0% (0 from 8)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 8)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 119,432,699
Small scale tenders 22,725,304
Unregulated purchases 360,575,640
Total 502,733,643

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

80%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Silnice II/286 revitalizace ul. Žižkova, Jilemnice
Contract modification
47,677,702 4,451,553 (+10%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

40%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.78 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 3 tenders
1000K+ 7 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.