Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Jilemnice

IČO 00275808

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.

76.
ranking
70%
Zindex
Show average values  
49%
Bidder participation
89%
Winner concentration
49%
Pro-competitive tools
47%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
89%
Competitive contracting
82%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
29%
Buyer profile data quality

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

49%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Silnice II/286 revitalizace ul. Žižkova, Jilemnice
Road-repair works
4
Ø5 in industry
Silnice II/293 Jilemnice, humanizace
Roadworks
7
Ø7 in industry
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC ve vybraných objektech města Jilemnice
Energy and related services
4
Ø2 in industry
Všesportovní a volnočasový areál Hraběnka – II. a III. realizační celek
Construction work for sports facilities
3
Ø3 in industry
Údržba místních komunikací ve městě Jilemnice v zimním období 2019–2023
Cleaning and sanitation services in urban or rural areas, and related services
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

89%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
M - SILNICE a.s.
 2 55,398,457
COLAS CZ, a.s.
 1 43,370,827
MVV Energie CZ a.s.
 1 18,417,230
Daniel Flamberg
 2 13,300,000
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
 1 11,578,700
Other suppliers 41 38,801,079

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 154,504,800
Small scale tenders 27,879,869
Unregulated purchases 648,611,159
Total 830,995,828

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Silnice II/286 revitalizace ul. Žižkova, Jilemnice
Contract modification 		47,677,702 4,451,553 (+10%)
Všesportovní a volnočasový areál Hraběnka – II. a III. realizační celek
Contract modification 		15,441,509 303,040 (+2%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

82%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.86
Average decision length 70.29 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 8% (1 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

29%
average 43%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 77% (zakázek z 13 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.46 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 0 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 3 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 1 zakázka
more than 1mil Kč 5 zakázek