Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Brno

IČO 44992785

The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

48%
average 63%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

92%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Imos Brno, a.s.
14 482,353,541
D.i.s., spol. s r.o.
7 445,006,645
Firesta-fišer, rekonstrukce, stavby a.s.
12 379,003,367
Moravostav Brno, a.s. stavební společnost
10 267,852,261
Komfort,a.s.
15 251,823,241
Other suppliers 414 2,663,565,183

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (44 from 0)
Nonprice competition 56% (90 from 162)
Division into lots 19% (31 from 162)
E-auction 2% (3 from 162)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 162)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

52%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 4,559,736,134
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 12,052,333,983
Total 16,612,070,117

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

66%
average 77%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dobudovaní oddílného kanalizačního systému v MČ Brno-Starý Lískovec -dodatek č.2 ke smlouvě o dílo
Not disclosed
- 220,852,194
Rozšíření a rozvoj systému GINIS
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 10,860,000
„Modernizace bytových jader Brno – Černovice, Húskova 6, 8, 10“
Not disclosed
- 9,777,597
„Modernizace bytových jader Brno – Černovice, Húskova 6, 8, 10“
Dodatečné práce
- 9,596,217
Rozšíření a rozvoj systému GINIS
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 8,868,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 21%
Average requirements modifications count 0.55

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (9 from 477)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 477)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 477)
Missing call for tenders 14% (66 from 477)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 477)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 477)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

40%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 52% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.93 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

86%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 477)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 2% (8 from 477)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 1% (4 from 477)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 477)
Supplier bankruptcy 3% (15 from 477)
Supplier donating to political party 10% (47 from 477)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 23% (110 from 477)