Competitions are open to multiple bidders. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Dolní Sedlo - VODOVOD; Hrádek nad Nisou
Ancillary works for pipelines and cables |
4
Ø5 in industry |
|
Hrádek nad Nisou, Nová Loučná - kanalizace, výtlak a ČSOV
Sewer construction work |
4
Ø6 in industry |
|
Sociální bydlení Hrádek nad Nisou
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
Tvorba mokřadních biotopů v k.ú. Loučná
Construction work |
7
Ø4 in industry |
|
Domov pro seniory - Hrádek nad Nisou - Projektová dokumentace
Engineering design services for the construction of civil engineering works |
6
Ø2 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
STAVITELSTVÍ ŘEHOŘ, s.r.o. |
2 | 35,105,565 |
|
PULSKLIMA, spol. s r.o. |
3 | 25,577,411 |
|
Pozemní stavitelství s.r.o. |
2 | 20,324,235 |
|
POHL cz, a.s. |
1 | 20,322,008 |
|
SKJ s.r.o. |
6 | 18,215,972 |
| Other suppliers | 34 | 159,112,976 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
STAVITELSTVÍ ŘEHOŘ, s.r.o. |
2 | 35,105,565 |
|
PULSKLIMA, spol. s r.o. |
3 | 25,577,411 |
|
Pozemní stavitelství s.r.o. |
2 | 20,324,235 |
|
POHL cz, a.s. |
1 | 20,322,008 |
|
SKJ s.r.o. |
6 | 18,215,972 |
|
Ještědská stavební společnost spol. s r.o. |
1 | 14,783,557 |
|
T4 Building s.r.o. |
1 | 11,892,798 |
|
Energy Benefit Centre a.s. |
1 | 10,750,000 |
|
Stavby MH s.r.o. |
1 | 10,500,000 |
|
EMH stavební CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 9,935,379 |
|
BASLET s.r.o. |
4 | 6,729,124 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 5,545,534 |
|
1.jizerskohorská stavební společnost, s.r.o. |
3 | 5,377,671 |
|
AV MEDIA, a.s. |
1 | 4,359,677 |
|
AirPlus, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 3,511,376 |
|
PORR a.s. |
1 | 3,439,510 |
|
Miroslav Hochman |
3 | 3,261,967 |
|
Profil Plus s.r.o. |
2 | 3,145,776 |
|
MSV Liberec, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,199,946 |
|
JIB s.r.o. |
2 | 1,826,003 |
|
FS Vision, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,394,000 |
|
OK GARDEN s.r.o. |
1 | 978,959 |
|
AUTOCONT a.s. |
1 | 637,064 |
|
INVESTING CZ spol. s r.o. |
1 | 312,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 1) |
| Nonprice competition | 35% (6 from 17) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 17) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 17) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 17) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 247,251,772 |
| Small scale tenders | 79,751,927 |
| Unregulated purchases | 372,222,634 |
| Total | 699,226,333 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 451,994,715 |
| Material consumption | 18,618,702 |
| Energy consumption | 17,208,011 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 212,657 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 66,395,270 |
| Travel costs | 194,523 |
| Representation costs | 933,346 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 121,388,268 |
| Small long-term property costs | 13,733,135 |
| Other costs | 8,547,707 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Komunitní centrum SENÍK, Hrádek nad Nisou Contract modification |
10,128,977 | 421,052 (+5%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Komunitní centrum SENÍK, Hrádek nad Nisou Contract modification |
10,128,977 | 421,052 (+5%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 17) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 17) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 17) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 17) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 17) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 17) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 88% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.59 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 17 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
