Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Nakládání s komunálním odpadem pro město Nový Bor 2020 - 2024
Refuse and waste related services |
2
Ø1 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce podstávkového domu č.p. 106 Nový Bor-II. opakované řízení
Restoration work |
2
Ø3 in industry |
|
Rozšíření varovného protipovodňového opatření pro město Nový Bor - modernizace a rozšíření stávajícího varovného a informačního systému
Electrical machinery, apparatus, equipment and consumables; lighting |
3
Ø1 in industry |
|
Oprava střešního pláště č. p. 1, nám. Míru Nový Bor
Construction work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Víceúčelové sportovní hřiště při ZŠ náměstí Míru Nový Bor - 3. opakované řízení
Construction work |
8
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
COMPAG MLADÁ BOLESLAV s.r.o. |
1 | 34,167,267 |
|
COMPAG CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 34,167,267 |
|
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o. |
5 | 22,000,000 |
|
STAMO, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 15,395,340 |
|
TELMO a.s. |
2 | 8,953,999 |
| Other suppliers | 50 | 161,529,166 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
COMPAG MLADÁ BOLESLAV s.r.o. |
1 | 34,167,267 |
|
COMPAG CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 34,167,267 |
|
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o. |
5 | 22,000,000 |
|
STAMO, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 15,395,340 |
|
TELMO a.s. |
2 | 8,953,999 |
|
Silnice Žáček s.r.o. |
5 | 7,957,408 |
|
Milan Szabo |
1 | 7,484,256 |
|
StavoSport s.r.o. |
1 | 7,450,177 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
1 | 5,387,063 |
|
SANAP společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 5,139,166 |
|
DOKOM FINAL s.r.o. |
3 | 4,419,600 |
|
TERMI s.r.o. |
1 | 3,611,582 |
|
Setertix Group |
1 | 3,378,542 |
|
BLÁHA trade s.r.o. |
1 | 3,320,353 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
1 | 2,695,395 |
|
Projektová kancelář VANER s.r.o. |
2 | 2,676,220 |
|
WAKOS, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,225,776 |
|
VFSITE s.r.o. |
2 | 1,834,940 |
|
AV MEDIA SYSTEMS, a.s. |
1 | 1,674,000 |
|
Vodní zdroje Ekomonitor spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,631,966 |
|
O2 Czech Republic a.s. |
1 | 1,552,800 |
|
Skanska a.s. |
1 | 1,478,692 |
|
LAMAL s.r.o. |
1 | 1,377,706 |
|
Stavební firma KULT s.r.o. |
1 | 1,156,369 |
|
ZEPS s.r.o. |
2 | 1,151,529 |
|
SME s.r.o. |
1 | 1,100,214 |
|
OKNA LANGER s.r.o. |
1 | 1,099,100 |
|
QUERCUS NÁBYTEK, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,093,850 |
|
Raamar, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,030,794 |
|
HANTYCH s.r.o. |
1 | 933,000 |
|
R-built s.r.o. |
1 | 763,800 |
|
Auto Babiš s.r.o. |
1 | 649,000 |
|
FLAME System s.r.o. |
1 | 608,000 |
|
AUTO KP PLUS SU s.r.o. |
1 | 464,380 |
|
Vodohospodářský rozvoj a výstavba a.s. zkráceně VRV a.s. |
1 | 429,000 |
|
SAMAB PRESS GROUP, a.s. |
1 | 301,312 |
|
V A R I A s.r.o. - inženýrská činnost a provádění staveb |
1 | 280,000 |
|
ALESTRA s.r.o. |
1 | 237,226 |
|
AUTO GREMOS, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 229,835 |
|
Gerhard Horejsek a spol., s.r.o. |
1 | 213,884 |
|
Karel Hladík |
1 | 149,000 |
|
Vodohospodářské projekty s.r.o. |
1 | 50,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 33% (1 from 3) |
| Nonprice competition | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Division into lots | 22% (2 from 9) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 9) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 180,016,803 |
| Small scale tenders | 122,464,386 |
| Unregulated purchases | 282,019,041 |
| Total | 584,500,230 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 159,923,509 |
| Material consumption | 17,058,347 |
| Energy consumption | 28,377,351 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 2,544,030 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 148,151,380 |
| Travel costs | 666,777 |
| Representation costs | 1,875,256 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 209,322,870 |
| Small long-term property costs | 9,583,869 |
| Other costs | 6,996,839 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Oprava střešního pláště č. p. 1, nám. Míru Nový Bor Contract modification |
7,484,256 | 2,175,005 (+30%) |
|
Rekonstrukce podstávkového domu č.p. 106 Nový Bor-II. opakované řízení Contract modification |
15,395,340 | 980,763 (+7%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Oprava střešního pláště č. p. 1, nám. Míru Nový Bor Contract modification |
7,484,256 | 2,175,005 (+30%) |
|
Rekonstrukce podstávkového domu č.p. 106 Nový Bor-II. opakované řízení Contract modification |
15,395,340 | 980,763 (+7%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 11) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 11) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 11) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 11) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 11) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 11) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.00 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
