Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Mělník

IČO 00237051

There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

70.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vehlovice výstavba kanalizace
Sewage, refuse, cleaning and environmental services
6
Ø2 in industry
Centrum seniorů Mělník, Penzion – stavební úpravy
Electrical installation work
3
Ø3 in industry
Modernizace autobusového terminálu v Mělníku
Construction work for buildings relating to road transport
4
Ø5 in industry
Dům služeb čp. 3359 – úprava 2. NP pro knihovnu
Construction work for buildings relating to leisure, sports, culture, lodging and restaurants
3
Ø3 in industry
Vedení cyklodopravy ve městě Mělník – I. etapa
Cycle path construction work
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ZEPRIS s.r.o.
1 49,850,378
VPK Suchý s.r.o.
1 49,850,378
STAVEBNÍ FIRMA NEUMANN s.r.o.
7 36,190,032
Raeder & Falge s.r.o.
1 23,968,010
STAVEBNÍ SPOLEČNOST GUTTENBERG s.r.o.
2 22,475,527
Other suppliers 47 274,558,716

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

35%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 300,431,016
Small scale tenders 44,315,929
Unregulated purchases 688,070,304
Total 1,032,817,248

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce MŠ Čtyřlístek, Mělník
Contract modification
9,366,200 494,059 (+6%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 26)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 26)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 26)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 26)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 26)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 26)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

54%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.23 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 26 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 4 tenders
500K-1000K 11 tenders
1000K+ 11 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.