Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Bystřice nad Pernštejnem

IČO 00294136

The competition for contracts is low. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Zázemí sportovního areálu
Construction work for sports facilities
Ø3 in industry
Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - rekonstrukce ulic Rud. Vaška a Zahradní
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
Ø2 in industry
Chodník ulice Vírská – Pod Horou Bystřice n. P.
Paths and other metalled surfaces
Ø4 in industry
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
Ø6 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření města Bystřice nad Pernštejnem
Surveillance and security systems and devices
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SPH stavby s.r.o.
3 34,270,070
ARCHATT PAMÁTKY spol. s r.o.
1 22,450,186
1 14,165,470
TS města a.s.
5 9,850,442
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 6,609,100
Other suppliers 24 76,635,101

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 159,324,991
Small scale tenders 94,045,783
Unregulated purchases 669,223,439
Total 922,594,212

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.38 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 8 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 10 tenders
1000K+ 18 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.