Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Bystřice nad Pernštejnem

IČO 00294136

The competition for contracts is low. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

21%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zázemí sportovního areálu
Construction work for sports facilities
4
Ø3 in industry
Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - rekonstrukce ulic Rud. Vaška a Zahradní
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Chodník ulice Vírská – Pod Horou Bystřice n. P.
Paths and other metalled surfaces
1
Ø4 in industry
OKRUŽNÍ - ETAPA D
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
5
Ø6 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření města Bystřice nad Pernštejnem
Surveillance and security systems and devices
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SPH stavby s.r.o.
3 34,270,070
ARCHATT PAMÁTKY spol. s r.o.
1 22,450,186
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s.
1 14,165,470
TS města a.s.
5 9,850,442
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 6,609,100
Other suppliers 24 76,635,101

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

52%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 159,324,991
Small scale tenders 94,045,783
Unregulated purchases 669,223,439
Total 922,594,212

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

64%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.38 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 8 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 10 tenders
1000K+ 18 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.