Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Tišnov

IČO 00282707

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

36%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Smuteční síň na Novém hřbitově v Tišnově II.
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Letní kino v Tišnově 1. etapa
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy a modernizace provozu kuchyně ZŠ Tišnov, nám. 28 října 1708
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Tišnov - parkoviště u nádraží
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce bytového domu Na Mlékárně č.p. 255
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

85%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stavební firma MATYÁŠ s.r.o.
2 32,478,000
PORR a.s.
2 16,947,903
Stavitelství Zemánek s.r.o.
1 16,389,230
CERGOMONT s.r.o.
1 13,896,896
BAUMAT, spol. s r.o.
1 10,994,221
Other suppliers 4 47,149,038

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 190,924,168
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 357,176,254
Total 548,100,422

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce bytového domu Na Mlékárně č.p. 255
Contract modification
10,994,221 770,889 (+8%)
Letní kino v Tišnově 1. etapa
Contract modification
16,389,230 410,192 (+3%)
Stavební úpravy a modernizace provozu kuchyně ZŠ Tišnov, nám. 28 října 1708
Contract modification
13,896,896 351,207 (+3%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.