Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Tišnov

IČO 00282707

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

73%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
II/379 TIŠNOV – DRÁSOV, II. ET. TIŠNOV, UL. BRNĚNSKÁ
Construction work
8
Ø4 in industry
Víceúčelové sportoviště Smíškova, Tišnov
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy a modernizace provozu kuchyně ZŠ Tišnov, nám. 28 října 1708
Construction work
2
Ø3 in industry
Tišnov - Park pod kostelem
Construction work
7
Ø3 in industry
Tišnov - parkoviště u nádraží
Construction work
5
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

89%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 38,888,889
Porr a.s.
2 28,070,811
MERTASTAV s.r.o.
2 14,006,136
CERGOMONT s.r.o.
1 13,896,896
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 12,766,872
Other suppliers 4 30,510,721

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

38%
average 32%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

42%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 102,522,279
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 487,733,710
Total 590,255,989

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

92%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
CS Tišnov - Březina, úsek Subterra - koupaliště
Contract modification
7,847,568 1,518,799 (+20%)
Rekonstrukce bytového domu Na Mlékárně č.p. 255
Contract modification
10,994,221 770,889 (+8%)
Stavební úpravy a modernizace provozu kuchyně ZŠ Tišnov, nám. 28 října 1708
Contract modification
13,896,896 351,207 (+3%)
II/379 TIŠNOV – DRÁSOV, II. ET. TIŠNOV, UL. BRNĚNSKÁ
Contract modification
38,888,889 248,021 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

70%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.40
Average decision length 132.60 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 18% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders