Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Tišnov

IČO 00282707

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Smuteční síň na Novém hřbitově v Tišnově II.
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Letní kino v Tišnově 1. etapa
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy a modernizace provozu kuchyně ZŠ Tišnov, nám. 28 října 1708
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Tišnov - parkoviště u nádraží
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce bytového domu Na Mlékárně č.p. 255
Construction work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stavební firma MATYÁŠ s.r.o.
2 32,478,000
PORR a.s.
2 16,947,903
Stavitelství Zemánek s.r.o.
1 16,389,230
1 13,896,896
BAUMAT, spol. s r.o.
1 10,994,221
Other suppliers 4 47,149,038

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 190,924,168
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 357,176,254
Total 548,100,422

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce bytového domu Na Mlékárně č.p. 255
Contract modification
10,994,221 770,889 (+8%)
Letní kino v Tišnově 1. etapa
Contract modification
16,389,230 410,192 (+3%)
Stavební úpravy a modernizace provozu kuchyně ZŠ Tišnov, nám. 28 října 1708
Contract modification
13,896,896 351,207 (+3%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.