Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Přibyslav

IČO 00268097

Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

70.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

40%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zateplení kulturního domu v Přibyslavi
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Zateplení kulturního domu v Přibyslavi
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
5
Ø2 in industry
Stavební úpravy MK ulice Pelikánova a ulice Rašínova, Přibyslav
Construction work for highways, roads
4
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy mateřské a základní školy v Přibyslavi včetně vybudování a vybavení školních dílen ZŠ Přibyslav - Část A: Rekonstrukce MŠ
Construction work for school buildings
2
Ø3 in industry
OKRUŽNÍ KŘIŽOVATKA NA I/19, PŘIBYSLAV
Road construction works
2
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

94%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
HV stavby a práce s.r.o.
2 22,662,174
Stavrecon Pardubice s.r.o.
2 22,130,057
FastBuilder Soft, s.r.o.
1 20,850,000
M-SILNICE a.s.
1 17,096,786
PORR a.s.
2 16,642,134
Other suppliers 35 158,544,578

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

82%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 146,313,857
Small scale tenders 70,016,569
Unregulated purchases 108,074,421
Total 324,404,848

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Technická infrastruktura pro 16 RD Pod Osivou - II. Etapa“ a „Rekonstrukce ul. Malinského v Přibyslavi
Contract modification
6,640,732 223,667 (+4%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 14)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 14)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 14)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 93% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.14 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 9 tenders
1000K+ 15 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.