Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Přibyslav

IČO 00268097

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

62.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

53%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
KANALIZACE PŘIBYSLAV, MÍSTNÍ ČÁSTI DOBRÁ - KEŘKOV
Construction work
20
Ø4 in industry
Přístavba Mateřské školy Bezručova v Přibyslavi
Construction work
2
Ø3 in industry
OH Ronov nad Sázavou - Rozšíření a rekultivace skládky - pole č. 5
Engineering works and construction works
7
Ø4 in industry
Technická infrastruktura pro 16 RD Pod Osivou v Přibyslavi
Construction work for highways, roads
9
Ø6 in industry
Technická infrastruktura pro 16 RD Pod Osivou - II. Etapa“ a „Rekonstrukce ul. Malinského v Přibyslavi
Construction work for highways, roads
6
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

92%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STAVAK spol. s r.o.
4 36,618,161
Chládek a Tintěra Havlíčkův Brod, a.s.
1 11,464,131
VHST s.r.o.
1 8,111,171
STRABAG a.s.
1 6,640,732
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 4,487,191
Other suppliers 29 46,679,180

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

32%
average 32%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 76,362,520
Small scale tenders 26,514,469
Unregulated purchases 202,077,366
Total 304,954,355

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

66%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
KANALIZACE PŘIBYSLAV, MÍSTNÍ ČÁSTI DOBRÁ - KEŘKOV
Contract modification
33,382,001 7,439,073 (+23%)
Technická infrastruktura pro 16 RD Pod Osivou - II. Etapa“ a „Rekonstrukce ul. Malinského v Přibyslavi
Contract modification
6,640,732 223,667 (+4%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 64%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

73%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.29 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 13 tenders
1000K+ 13 tenders