Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Sběr, svoz a odstranění komunálního odpadu, svoz bioodpadu, využití vytříděných složek komunálního odpadu a správa sběrného dvora ve městě Teplice pro období 2016 - 2020
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady |
2
Ø3 in industry |
|
Údržba městské zeleně na území města Teplice v letech 2014 - 2015
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch |
3
Ø5 in industry |
|
Správa, běžná údržba, provoz a opravy veřejného, vánočního a slavnostního osvětlení, kolektorů a energetických zdrojů na území Statutárního města Teplice v letech 2016-2020
Údržba pouličního osvětlení |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Dodávka tří kusů dvanáctimetrových nízkopodlažních trolejbusů
Trolejbusy |
2
Ø1 in industry |
|
Zajištění energetických úspor Základní školy Maršovská 1575
Stavební úpravy školních budov |
8
Ø5 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
Marius Pedersen a.s. |
10 | 219,628,951 |
|
Eltodo-citelum, s.r.o. |
1 | 30,351,964 |
|
Škoda Electric a.s. |
1 | 28,095,000 |
|
Euromont Group a.s. |
2 | 25,389,619 |
|
Mostecká montážní a.s. |
2 | 23,713,705 |
| Other suppliers | 19 | 69,407,548 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Marius Pedersen a.s. |
10 | 219,628,951 |
|
Eltodo-citelum, s.r.o. |
1 | 30,351,964 |
|
Škoda Electric a.s. |
1 | 28,095,000 |
|
Euromont Group a.s. |
2 | 25,389,619 |
|
Mostecká montážní a.s. |
2 | 23,713,705 |
|
Strabag a.s. |
4 | 17,556,234 |
|
Telkont s.r.o. |
3 | 13,197,840 |
|
Metrostav a.s. |
1 | 6,384,770 |
|
Čez Energetické služby, s.r.o. |
1 | 5,678,966 |
|
Jan Vaňkát |
2 | 5,278,813 |
|
Stostav s.r.o. |
1 | 4,684,041 |
|
Uniplast - dux s.r.o. |
1 | 3,229,684 |
|
Stavební firma Nao s. r. o. |
1 | 2,640,932 |
|
Havi s.r.o. |
1 | 2,559,659 |
|
Sial architekti a inženýři spol. s r.o. Liberec |
1 | 2,320,000 |
|
Eurovia Cs, a.s. |
1 | 2,221,957 |
|
Herkul a.s. |
1 | 1,986,107 |
|
Elektrosys s.r.o. |
1 | 1,668,545 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (3 from 0) |
| Nonprice competition | 25% (2 from 8) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 8) |
| E-auction and DPS | 0% (0 from 8) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% ( from 8) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 396,586,792 |
| Small scale tenders | 0 |
| Unregulated purchases | 747,481,482 |
| Total | 1,144,068,274 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Zajištění energetických úspor Základní školy Verdunská 2958 - vícepráce Dodatečné práce |
- | 96,064 |
|
Zajištění energetických úspor Základní školy Maršovská 1575/2 - vícepráce Dodatečné práce |
- | 39,916 |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Zajištění energetických úspor Základní školy Verdunská 2958 - vícepráce Dodatečné práce |
- | 96,064 |
|
Zajištění energetických úspor Základní školy Maršovská 1575/2 - vícepráce Dodatečné práce |
- | 39,916 |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 15% |
| Cancelled contracts | 23% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.23 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 35) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 35) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 35) |
| Missing call for tenders | 37% (13 from 35) |
| Missing winning price | 0% ( from 35) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% ( from 35) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 40% (zakázek z ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.64 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law) |
|
Do the risky firms win frequently? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award | 0% (0 from 35) |
| Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement | 0% (0 from 35) |
| Subcontractor share above 50 % | 3% (1 from 35) |
| Supplier demise shortly after contract | 0% (0 from 35) |
| Supplier bankruptcy | 0% (0 from 35) |
| Supplier donating to political party | 29% (10 from 35) |
| Supplier did not publish financial results on time | 6% (2 from 35) |
