The competition for contracts is low. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Parkovací dům Kralupy nad Vltavou
Construction work |
10
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce jídelny a kuchyně a přístavba nad jídelnou v ZŠ Komenského náměstí 198, Kralupy nad Vltavou
Construction work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Autobusový terminál Kralupy nad Vltavou
Construction work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
|
Cyklostezka Kralupy nad Vltavou - Zákolany
Paths and other metalled surfaces |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Pojištění majetku a odpovědnosti města Kralupy nad Vltavou
Insurance services |
1
Ø2 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
GEMO OLOMOUC, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 117,464,406 |
|
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 83,674,990 |
|
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 32,474,295 |
|
FCC Regios, a.s. |
5 | 21,770,352 |
|
Gardenline s.r.o. |
1 | 21,270,857 |
| Other suppliers | 79 | 477,824,215 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
GEMO OLOMOUC, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 117,464,406 |
|
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 83,674,990 |
|
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 32,474,295 |
|
FCC Regios, a.s. |
5 | 21,770,352 |
|
Gardenline s.r.o. |
1 | 21,270,857 |
|
Česká pojišťovna a.s. |
1 | 17,499,795 |
|
Metrostav a.s. |
1 | 17,333,000 |
|
ELTODO, a.s. |
1 | 17,174,385 |
|
ZENOVA services s.r.o. |
3 | 14,131,532 |
|
Vít Humpl |
2 | 12,688,568 |
|
Atelier 99 s.r.o. |
1 | 11,840,000 |
|
Ing. Milan Janda |
3 | 11,157,010 |
|
Metrostav Infrastructure a.s. |
1 | 10,399,476 |
|
Společnost T.A.Q. s.r.o. |
1 | 9,495,766 |
|
Ulimex, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 8,793,830 |
|
STAVEBNÍ FIRMA NEUMANN s.r.o. |
6 | 8,138,651 |
|
DAVÍDEK - DKE s.r.o. |
4 | 7,155,930 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 6,178,975 |
|
VoiceSys s.r.o. |
1 | 5,205,251 |
|
OK Stavby s.r.o. |
2 | 4,980,724 |
|
Bartoň a Partner s.r.o. |
1 | 4,797,067 |
|
BSS Praha s.r.o. |
1 | 3,948,800 |
|
SARK engineering, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,420,889 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
1 | 3,176,654 |
|
Mystic constructions spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,744,720 |
|
Ridera Bohemia a.s. |
1 | 2,365,778 |
|
MORKUS Morava s.r.o. |
1 | 2,354,674 |
|
KHL-EKO, a.s. |
1 | 2,341,939 |
|
PLÁN PLUS, s.r.o. |
4 | 2,045,200 |
|
Miramid s.r.o. |
1 | 1,969,530 |
|
Jan Hrušovský |
1 | 1,800,000 |
|
HESS-projekty a realizace staveb, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,770,000 |
|
SAURA, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,735,000 |
|
MEVA-TEC s.r.o. |
1 | 1,709,100 |
|
OK GARDEN s.r.o. |
1 | 1,530,988 |
|
MEVA-TRADE, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,262,500 |
|
Kyllar František |
1 | 991,560 |
|
CODE spol. s r. o. |
1 | 960,000 |
|
GREEN PROJECT s.r.o. |
1 | 949,862 |
|
Tiskárna v Ráji s.r.o. |
1 | 913,920 |
|
NOZA, s.r.o. |
2 | 909,301 |
|
AUTO-BRANKA, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 801,422 |
|
EU POLYMER CZ, odštěpný závod |
1 | 754,732 |
|
VERTICO, s.r.o. |
1 | 743,250 |
|
Agrokom-tech BRYSS s.r.o. |
1 | 733,216 |
|
RAISA, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 725,306 |
|
HOKO-VH s.r.o. |
1 | 723,400 |
|
ANTE spol. s r.o. |
3 | 720,000 |
|
Pavel Kubísek |
1 | 683,000 |
|
Atelier PROMIKA s.r.o. |
1 | 610,000 |
|
MONTAKO - stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 607,930 |
|
Warantia s.r.o. |
1 | 570,000 |
|
ANADA HS s.r.o. |
1 | 525,000 |
|
Ladislav Nápravník |
1 | 524,800 |
|
ATELIÉR DUK s.r.o. |
1 | 498,800 |
|
FarmTechnik |
1 | 408,000 |
|
PORSENNA o.p.s. |
1 | 345,000 |
|
BDO Advisory s.r.o. |
1 | 250,000 |
|
ARCH consulting s.r.o. |
1 | 235,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 14) |
| Nonprice competition | 14% (4 from 29) |
| Division into lots | 17% (5 from 29) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 29) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 29) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 489,598,855 |
| Small scale tenders | 119,262,078 |
| Unregulated purchases | 304,256,051 |
| Total | 913,116,984 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 604,346,608 |
| Material consumption | 20,072,873 |
| Energy consumption | 26,456,032 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 2,540,267 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 42,110,106 |
| Travel costs | 902,233 |
| Representation costs | 1,582,494 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 161,405,480 |
| Small long-term property costs | 8,006,904 |
| Other costs | 45,693,987 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Parkovací dům Kralupy nad Vltavou Contract modification |
84,990,111 | 8,184,631 (+10%) |
|
Autobusový terminál Kralupy nad Vltavou Contract modification |
64,948,590 | 2,961,147 (+5%) |
|
Rekonstrukce komunikace v ulicích Čechova a Vrchlického, Kralupy nad Vltavou - I. etapa Contract modification |
17,333,000 | 925,144 (+6%) |
|
Cyklostezka Kralupy nad Vltavou - Zákolany Contract modification |
21,270,857 | 887,798 (+5%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Parkovací dům Kralupy nad Vltavou Contract modification |
84,990,111 | 8,184,631 (+10%) |
|
Autobusový terminál Kralupy nad Vltavou Contract modification |
64,948,590 | 2,961,147 (+5%) |
|
Rekonstrukce komunikace v ulicích Čechova a Vrchlického, Kralupy nad Vltavou - I. etapa Contract modification |
17,333,000 | 925,144 (+6%) |
|
Cyklostezka Kralupy nad Vltavou - Zákolany Contract modification |
21,270,857 | 887,798 (+5%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 21% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.71 |
| Average decision length | 59.07 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 30) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 30) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 30) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 30) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 30) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 30) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.19 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 27 tenders under the law) |
|
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Cyklostezka Kralupy nad Vltavou - Zákolany | Payment information missing |
| Svoz separovaného odpadu a bioodpadů přímo z domácností ve městě Kralupy nad Vltavou | Payment information missing |
| Parkovací dům Kralupy nad Vltavou | Payment information missing |
| Revitalizace funkčních ploch a prvků sídelní zeleně - sídliště LOBEČEK, Kralupy nad Vltavou | Payment information missing |
| Dodávka zemního plynu pro roky 2021 a 2022 | Payment information missing |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
