Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Kralupy nad Vltavou

IČO 00236977

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. The competition for contracts is low.

24.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

20%
average 47%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
DEREZA, společnost s ručením omezeným
3 105,003,536
Gardenline s.r.o.
4 66,939,044
STRABAG a.s.
3 20,508,975
Česká pojišťovna a.s.
1 17,499,795
Metrostav a.s.
1 17,333,000
Other suppliers 84 172,757,456

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

48%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 12% (1 from 8)
Nonprice competition 15% (4 from 26)
Division into lots 27% (7 from 26)
E-auction 0% (0 from 26)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 26)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

73%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 270,317,309
Small scale tenders 111,409,448
Unregulated purchases 342,472,001
Total 724,198,758

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Cyklostezka Kralupy nad Vltavou - Zákolany
Contract modification
21,270,857 887,798 (+5%)
Řešení zpevněných ploch v centru města Kralupy nad Vltavou - II. ETAPA
Contract modification
27,488,994 843,159 (+4%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

92%
average 64%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 27)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 27)
Missing buyer ID 4% (1 from 27)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 27)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 27)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 27)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

67%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.56 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 27 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 4 tenders
500K-1000K 21 tenders
1000K+ 31 tenders