Buyer profile has high number of errors. The competition for contracts is high.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Regenerace Benešovy třídy v Hradci Králové – 1. etapa - 2. část
Výstavba podzemních parkovišť |
14
Ø5 in industry |
|
Okružní křižovatka U Koruny v Hradci Králové
Stavební práce pro potrubní, telekomunikační a elektrické vedení |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
Zajištění systému svozu rostlinné biomasy, komunitního kompostování, svozu odpadů z odpadkových košů a souvisejících činností
Sběr odpadu |
3
Ø3 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce Bílé věže v Hradci Králové
Kamenické a zednické práce |
8
Ø5 in industry |
|
ZŠ M.Horákové - zateplení objektu a výměna oken
Stavební práce |
10
Ø5 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
S T A K O společnost s ručením omezeným |
8 | 168,857,318 |
|
M - Silnice a.s. |
3 | 121,314,826 |
|
Matex Hk s.r.o. |
9 | 75,429,057 |
|
Bak stavební společnost, a.s. |
5 | 55,488,560 |
|
Hradecké služby a.s. |
1 | 50,199,826 |
| Other suppliers | 84 | 393,508,795 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
S T A K O společnost s ručením omezeným |
8 | 168,857,318 |
|
M - Silnice a.s. |
3 | 121,314,826 |
|
Matex Hk s.r.o. |
9 | 75,429,057 |
|
Bak stavební společnost, a.s. |
5 | 55,488,560 |
|
Hradecké služby a.s. |
1 | 50,199,826 |
|
Prumhor, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 38,168,499 |
|
Miras - stavitelství a sanace s.r.o. |
2 | 31,653,039 |
|
Id Stavby group s.r.o. |
1 | 26,485,967 |
|
Colas Cz, a.s. |
4 | 22,656,091 |
|
O2 Czech Republic a.s. |
1 | 21,808,000 |
|
Ag Com, a.s. |
5 | 20,832,532 |
|
E.on Energie, a.s. |
6 | 16,119,673 |
|
Servodata a.s. |
3 | 15,820,726 |
|
Metrostav a.s. |
4 | 14,172,718 |
|
Ep Energy Trading, a.s. |
1 | 13,355,199 |
|
Langerone, Se |
2 | 12,669,432 |
|
Redomo a.s. |
1 | 11,478,629 |
|
Centropol Energy, a.s. |
1 | 11,243,085 |
|
Sovis Cz, a.s. |
4 | 10,376,773 |
|
drevotvar.com družstvo |
1 | 8,989,957 |
|
B & J Holding,a.s. |
3 | 8,291,966 |
|
Atregia s.r.o. |
1 | 7,024,793 |
|
Stavo & Sachs Kukleny s.r.o. |
1 | 6,991,800 |
|
Pontevia Corp. a.s. |
6 | 6,819,776 |
|
Dopos Přelouč s.r.o. |
1 | 6,121,787 |
|
Eurovia Cs, a.s. |
2 | 5,940,839 |
|
Česká pošta, s.p. |
1 | 5,289,256 |
|
Wiss Czech, s.r.o. |
1 | 5,095,000 |
|
Marbes Consulting s.r.o. |
1 | 4,916,160 |
|
Valbek, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 4,890,000 |
|
Rwe Energie, s.r.o. |
1 | 4,489,461 |
|
Fiftyfifty kreativní agentura s.r.o. |
2 | 4,438,500 |
|
Matrix a.s. |
1 | 4,279,568 |
|
Veolia Komodity Čr, s.r.o. |
3 | 4,022,239 |
|
Mados Mt s.r.o. |
1 | 3,947,319 |
|
Pragoplyn, a.s. |
1 | 3,907,452 |
|
Milan Pospíchal |
2 | 3,760,380 |
|
Green Project s.r.o. |
1 | 3,423,317 |
|
Strabag a.s. |
1 | 3,220,229 |
|
Ing. Akad. arch. Kábrt Libor |
2 | 2,731,000 |
|
Pelouch Petr, Ing. |
1 | 2,477,642 |
|
C System Cz a.s. |
1 | 2,473,000 |
|
Icz a.s. |
1 | 2,311,200 |
|
Daite s.r.o. |
1 | 2,097,000 |
|
Onyx wood spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,599,897 |
|
Kospa systém, v.o.s. |
1 | 1,379,800 |
|
Smart effect s.r.o. |
1 | 1,201,500 |
|
Astor-komplex s.r.o. |
1 | 949,584 |
|
Martin Kraus |
1 | 944,017 |
|
Jp-kontakt, s.r.o. |
1 | 749,987 |
|
Vemex s.r.o. |
1 | 685,207 |
|
Vdi Meta - výrobní družstvo invalidů |
1 | 478,541 |
|
Cortis Consulting s.r.o. |
1 | 400,000 |
|
Autocentrum Barth a.s. |
1 | 330,258 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (14 from 0) |
| Nonprice competition | 10% (3 from 30) |
| Division into lots | 3% (1 from 30) |
| E-auction and DPS | 3% (1 from 30) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% ( from 30) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 886,606,390 |
| Small scale tenders | 0 |
| Unregulated purchases | 914,681,271 |
| Total | 1,801,287,661 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
"Rekonstrukce nám. 28. října a ulice S. K. Neumanna, Dukelská" - dodatečné stavební práce 6 Dodatečné práce |
- | 5,554,953 |
|
Technická podpora IS PROXIO Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody), Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody) |
- | 4,916,160 |
|
"Venkovní sportovní areál TJ Slavia Hradec Králové" - dodatečné stavební práce č. 4 Dodatečné práce |
- | 4,598,739 |
|
Základní a mateřské školy - výměna otvorových výplní vč. sanace boletických panelů - dodatečné stavební práce Dodatečné práce |
- | 4,038,041 |
|
Výstavba hřiště a šatnového objektu Farářství, Hradec Králové - dodatečné stavební práce 1 Dodatečné práce |
- | 3,565,111 |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 5% |
| Cancelled contracts | 13% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.65 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 2% (2 from 110) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 110) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 110) |
| Missing call for tenders | 8% (9 from 110) |
| Missing winning price | 0% ( from 110) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% ( from 110) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 4% (zakázek z ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.81 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law) |
|
Do the risky firms win frequently? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award | 1% (1 from 110) |
| Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement | 2% (2 from 110) |
| Subcontractor share above 50 % | 4% (4 from 110) |
| Supplier demise shortly after contract | 0% (0 from 110) |
| Supplier bankruptcy | 0% (0 from 110) |
| Supplier donating to political party | 21% (23 from 110) |
| Supplier did not publish financial results on time | 20% (22 from 110) |