Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Hradec Králové

IČO 00268810

Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

18.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

45%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Multifunkční Fotbalový stadion Hradec Králové
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Inteligentní dopravní systém v Hradci Králové
Miscellaneous transport equipment and spare parts
2
Ø2 in industry
Lávka přes Labe v Hradci Králové
Bridge construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Odlehčovací služba, Honkova ul., Hradec Králové
Construction work for social services buildings
4
Ø7 in industry
Obnova ZUŠ Střezina v areálu ZŠ a MŠ Jih, Hradec Králové - SO 05, SO 06 a SO 07
Construction work for school buildings
7
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

94%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STRABAG a.s.
2 284,917,911
CROSS Zlín, a.s.
1 229,270,670
D&D ELEKTROMONT s. r. o.
1 189,333,333
GEOSAN GROUP a.s.
1 189,333,333
SMP CZ, a.s.
1 133,746,219
Other suppliers 414 1,856,944,212

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

41%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 11% (7 from 65)
Nonprice competition 16% (14 from 90)
Division into lots 13% (12 from 90)
E-auction 1% (1 from 90)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 90)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

84%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,968,487,790
Small scale tenders 154,942,169
Unregulated purchases 878,129,747
Total 3,001,559,705

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Multifunkční Fotbalový stadion Hradec Králové
Contract modification
568,000,000 62,625,391 (+12%)
Rekonstrukce MŠ Sluníčko Hradec Králové, II. a III. etapa
Contract modification
23,412,661 3,677,364 (+16%)
Stavební úpravy bytového domu pro sociální bydlení Pražská třída č.p. 559, Hradec Králové, Kukleny
Contract modification
22,586,288 3,557,165 (+16%)
Úpravy pro nemotorovou dopravu v prostoru Zimního stadionu a trasy na „Hučák“
Contract modification
14,897,753 870,520 (+6%)
Resslova - spisovna
Contract modification
14,482,781 867,066 (+6%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

46%
average 56%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 2%
Cancelled contracts 16%
Average requirements modifications count 1.69
Average decision length 84.59 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 95)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 95)
Missing buyer ID 3% (3 from 95)
Missing call for tenders 1% (1 from 95)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 95)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 95)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

57%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 91% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.68 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 90 tenders under the law)
0-250K 74 tenders
250K-500K 29 tenders
500K-1000K 21 tenders
1000K+ 19 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.