Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Horažďovice

IČO 00255513

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
III/18614 Horažďovice – Třebomyslická ulice
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce Peškovy ulice - I. etapa
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
Ø4 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti DPS 1061, Horažďovice (opakované zadávací řízení)
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Základní technická vybavenost Loreta (dotační název akce: 21TI Horažďovice)
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace sídliště Šumavská, Pod Vodojemem, Horažďovice - III. a IV. etapa
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
COLAS CZ, a.s.
2 44,170,000
STAVEBNÍ SPOLEČNOST H a T, spol. s r. o.
5 31,859,599
Stavitelství Kamínek s.r.o.
1 27,987,060
Lesní stavby, s.r.o.
3 21,135,905
ENVI-PUR, s.r.o.
1 14,559,314
Other suppliers 45 161,808,958

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 18% (3 from 17)
Division into lots 12% (2 from 17)
E-auction 0% (0 from 17)
Innovative procedure 6% (1 from 17)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 189,569,133
Small scale tenders 97,202,867
Unregulated purchases 408,050,947
Total 694,822,947

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 8 tenders
1000K+ 20 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.