Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
III/18614 Horažďovice – Třebomyslická ulice
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce Peškovy ulice - I. etapa
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines |
11
Ø4 in industry |
|
Snížení energetické náročnosti DPS 1061, Horažďovice (opakované zadávací řízení)
Construction work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Základní technická vybavenost Loreta (dotační název akce: 21TI Horažďovice)
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines |
5
Ø4 in industry |
|
Revitalizace sídliště Šumavská, Pod Vodojemem, Horažďovice - III. a IV. etapa
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads |
8
Ø6 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
COLAS CZ, a.s. |
2 | 44,170,000 |
|
STAVEBNÍ SPOLEČNOST H a T, spol. s r. o. |
5 | 31,859,599 |
|
Stavitelství Kamínek s.r.o. |
1 | 27,987,060 |
|
Lesní stavby, s.r.o. |
3 | 21,135,905 |
|
ENVI-PUR, s.r.o. |
1 | 14,559,314 |
| Other suppliers | 45 | 161,808,958 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
COLAS CZ, a.s. |
2 | 44,170,000 |
|
STAVEBNÍ SPOLEČNOST H a T, spol. s r. o. |
5 | 31,859,599 |
|
Stavitelství Kamínek s.r.o. |
1 | 27,987,060 |
|
Lesní stavby, s.r.o. |
3 | 21,135,905 |
|
ENVI-PUR, s.r.o. |
1 | 14,559,314 |
|
ŠAFINVEST, s.r.o. |
3 | 14,268,828 |
|
STAFIS-KT s.r.o. |
5 | 13,748,807 |
|
Ondřej Císler |
2 | 11,632,480 |
|
Silnice Horšovský Týn a.s. |
1 | 10,900,000 |
|
ZNAKON, a.s. |
4 | 10,323,794 |
|
CONSTRUCT CONSULTING CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 5,166,205 |
|
Jan Sládek |
2 | 4,676,769 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
1 | 3,945,368 |
|
Projektový ateliér pro architekturu a pozemní stavby, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 3,561,700 |
|
Dušan Diviš |
2 | 2,719,673 |
|
Bíza Hilský Táborský architekti s.r.o. |
1 | 2,017,500 |
|
EKOEKO s.r.o. |
1 | 1,475,000 |
|
Šumavské vodovody a kanalizace a.s. |
1 | 1,247,756 |
|
Ing. Ladislav Hanuš |
1 | 1,239,000 |
|
AV MEDIA, a.s. |
2 | 1,121,538 |
|
Window Holding a.s. |
1 | 1,047,947 |
|
Recyklace Přeštice s.r.o. |
1 | 1,020,000 |
|
H.E.S. Technologies s.r.o. |
1 | 1,007,124 |
|
Miroslav Brůžek |
1 | 983,176 |
|
Jiří Urbánek |
1 | 972,500 |
|
Petr Pintíř |
1 | 899,649 |
|
ČEVAK a.s. |
1 | 683,960 |
|
Šumava Net s.r.o. |
1 | 634,290 |
|
Martin Korch |
1 | 565,371 |
|
Český nábytek a.s. |
1 | 381,780 |
|
Josef Choc |
1 | 99,667 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 0) |
| Nonprice competition | 18% (3 from 17) |
| Division into lots | 12% (2 from 17) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 17) |
| Innovative procedure | 6% (1 from 17) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 189,569,133 |
| Small scale tenders | 97,202,867 |
| Unregulated purchases | 408,050,947 |
| Total | 694,822,947 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 425,568,600 |
| Material consumption | 28,086,911 |
| Energy consumption | 28,366,243 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 448,815 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 682,600 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 96,173,414 |
| Travel costs | 566,557 |
| Representation costs | 1,545,480 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 95,945,159 |
| Small long-term property costs | 9,321,881 |
| Other costs | 8,117,286 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 19) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 19) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 19) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 19) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 19) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 19) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.00 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
