Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Otrokovice

IČO 00284301

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is high.

51.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
4 122,292,645
ALSPO ZLÍN s.r.o.
5 25,725,821
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
2 23,564,407
VESTAV group s.r.o.
3 17,801,043
PTÁČEK - pozemní stavby s.r.o.
1 16,199,281
Other suppliers 72 326,927,164

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

30%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 9% (2 from 23)
Division into lots 13% (3 from 23)
E-auction 9% (2 from 23)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 23)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

60%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 309,999,653
Small scale tenders 85,700,838
Unregulated purchases 719,063,374
Total 1,114,763,865

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 23)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 23)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 23)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 23)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 23)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 23)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 91% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.52 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 23 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 7 tenders
500K-1000K 19 tenders
1000K+ 28 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.