Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Lysá nad Labem

IČO 00239402

Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

48%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Sportovní hala Lysá nad Labem
Construction work
8
Ø4 in industry
II/272 Lysá nad Labem, průtah - stavba
Road-repair works
6
Ø5 in industry
REKONSTRUKCE A ZKAPACITNĚNÍ VDJ LYSÁ NAD LABEM
Ancillary works for pipelines and cables
5
Ø5 in industry
Parkoviště P+R v Lysé nad Labem
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce historické části radnice v Lysé nad Labem
Buildings of particular historical or architectural interest
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
POHL cz, a.s.
1 96,180,281
Metrostav Infrastructure a.s.
1 59,431,895
BFK service a.s.
2 40,745,779
Gardenline s.r.o.
2 36,621,445
STAVOKOMPLET spol. s r.o.
2 35,944,940
Other suppliers 19 323,731,379

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

44%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 29% (2 from 7)
Nonprice competition 24% (6 from 25)
Division into lots 4% (1 from 25)
E-auction 0% (0 from 25)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 25)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 457,961,337
Small scale tenders 14,904,145
Unregulated purchases 583,384,010
Total 1,056,249,492

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

77%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
II/272 Lysá nad Labem, průtah - stavba
Contract modification
59,431,895 20,046,762 (+34%)
Parkoviště P+R v Lysé nad Labem
Contract modification
29,345,053 5,134,384 (+18%)
Rekonstrukce bytového domu Na Františku 235
Contract modification
17,285,619 2,396,108 (+14%)

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 26)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 26)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 26)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 26)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 26)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 26)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

39%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 96% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.79 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 24 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.