Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Lysá nad Labem

IČO 00239402

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. The competition for contracts is low.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

24%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Parkoviště P+R v Lysé nad Labem
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Dostavba pavilonu „C“ a přístavba šaten k pavilonu „C“ školní budovy J.A.Komenského 1534/16, Lysá nad Labem – opakované řízení
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce bytového domu Na Františku 235
Construction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual houses
1
Ø4 in industry
Kanalizace a vodovod Byšičky
Sewage, refuse, cleaning and environmental services
10
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce bytového domu Na Františku 235
Construction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual houses
1
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 29,345,053
MATEX HK s.r.o.
1 19,470,220
STAVOKOMPLET spol. s r.o.
2 18,164,267
ARCUS-Růžička, spol. s r.o.
1 17,285,619
KVIS Pardubice a.s.
1 15,954,950
Other suppliers 12 71,140,927

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 32%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

51%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 160,533,909
Small scale tenders 19,903,469
Unregulated purchases 510,765,823
Total 691,203,201

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Parkoviště P+R v Lysé nad Labem
Contract modification
29,345,053 5,134,384 (+18%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

35%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 2.20
Average decision length 79.60 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 18)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 18)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

34%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.63 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 3 tenders