Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Bílina

IČO 00266230

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
AMP Chomutov a.s.
2 19,093,818
IPSEN, s.r.o.
5 15,290,234
1 12,026,881
NATURTEP spol. s r.o.
6 11,466,918
METALL QUATRO spol. s r.o.
1 11,458,492
Other suppliers 210 179,679,470

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 24)
Division into lots 50% (12 from 24)
E-auction 0% (0 from 24)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 24)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 141,898,152
Small scale tenders 98,661,207
Unregulated purchases 328,721,056
Total 569,280,415

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Vybudování podzemních kontejnerů pro zlepšení systému třídění komunálních odpadů ve městě Bílina
Contract modification
12,026,881 142,383 (+2%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 25)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 25)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 25)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 25)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 25)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 25)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.79 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 24 tenders under the law)
0-250K 106 tenders
250K-500K 39 tenders
500K-1000K 22 tenders
1000K+ 26 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.