Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Bílina

IČO 00266230

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

51.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

94%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
AMP Chomutov a.s.
2 19,093,818
IPSEN, s.r.o.
5 15,290,234
COMPAG MLADÁ BOLESLAV s.r.o.
1 12,026,881
NATURTEP spol. s r.o.
6 11,466,918
METALL QUATRO spol. s r.o.
1 11,458,492
Other suppliers 210 179,679,470

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 24)
Division into lots 50% (12 from 24)
E-auction 0% (0 from 24)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 24)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

65%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 141,898,152
Small scale tenders 98,661,207
Unregulated purchases 328,721,056
Total 569,280,415

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Vybudování podzemních kontejnerů pro zlepšení systému třídění komunálních odpadů ve městě Bílina
Contract modification
12,026,881 142,383 (+2%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 25)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 25)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 25)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 25)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 25)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 25)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

64%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.79 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 24 tenders under the law)
0-250K 106 tenders
250K-500K 39 tenders
500K-1000K 22 tenders
1000K+ 26 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.