Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Litomyšl

IČO 00276944

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

51.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Modernizace silnice II/360 Ústí nad Orlicí - Litomyšl
Carriageway resurfacing works
6
Ø5 in industry
Nadchod přes I/35, POLIKLINIKA
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Zainvestování území pro RD v lokalitě „Babka“ Litomyšl
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
7
Ø2 in industry
Navýšení kapacit sběrného dvora v Litomyšli
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Sociální bydlení v Litomyšli
Construction work
8
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

95%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STRABAG a.s.
1 136,814,886
PROFISTAV Litomyšl, a.s.
3 43,688,106
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s.
1 37,378,274
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s.
3 14,096,481
Kurštejn stavební a obchodní firma s.r.o.
1 13,280,422
Other suppliers 71 360,764,818

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

57%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 178,313,184
Small scale tenders 127,871,210
Unregulated purchases 641,266,172
Total 947,450,566

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Modernizace silnice II/360 Ústí nad Orlicí - Litomyšl
Contract modification
136,814,886 5,838,276 (+5%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

40%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.80
Average decision length 102.50 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

72%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.27 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law)
0-250K 13 tenders
250K-500K 5 tenders
500K-1000K 12 tenders
1000K+ 33 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.